• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Login

IATSE Local 695

Production Sound, Video Engineers & Studio Projectionists

  • About
    • About Local 695
    • Why & How to Join 695
    • Labor News & Info
    • IATSE Resolution on Abuse
    • IATSE Equality Statement
    • In Memoriam
    • Contact Us
  • Magazine
    • CURRENT and Past Issues
    • About the Magazine
    • Contact the Editors
    • How to Advertise
    • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • COVID-19 Info
    • Safety Hotlines
    • Health & Safety Info
    • FCC Licensing
    • IATSE Holiday Calendar
    • Assistance Programs
    • Photo Gallery
    • Organizing
    • Do Buy / Don’t Buy
    • Retiree Info & Resources
    • Industry Links
    • Film & TV Downloads
    • E-Waste & Recycling
    • Online Store
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Features

A Star Is Born

Photo by Clay Enos. Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures

by Steve Morrow

From my very first meeting, it was obvious that Bradley Cooper knew he wanted A Star Is Born to feel real and immersive. He certainly achieved that in this film, with handheld camera work and live vocals, he leads us into a world that feels simultaneously epic and intimately authentic.

As a director, Cooper cultivated a great atmosphere on set that was familial and inspiring to work in. Communication and collaboration were paramount for him, which fostered an environment where every member of the cast and crew could perform at their best.

Photo by Neal Preston. Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures

There was never any doubt that Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga would be singing live. Neither of them wanted the film to feel like a traditional musical and there would be no lip-syncing to playback. For me, this was a dream come true, recording a music-based film and capturing the performances live, with the production sound being the vocal track instead of a studio recording.

For the next few months, I ran through different concept setups to figure out exactly how to get the best vocals and tracks possible for the various scenarios we would be shooting in. To ensure that we had the best system in place, we set up a mini-concert during prep to run through and test the concepts. We ultimately landed on having the band perform to playback with just the vocals being recorded live. Jason Ruder, Music Editor, and one of the re-recording mixers, did a quick mix of the prep mini-concert and with Warner Bros., Cooper, and Gaga happy it was clear that we had landed on the right method.

The movie opens on Jackson Maine’s performance at Stagecoach, the entire scene was filmed live at Stagecoach in only eight minutes. We shot between two concert acts, Jamie Johnson and Willie Nelson. Moving only between their sets meant we got our gear up in the few minutes allotted before Johnson’s set and then filmed and broke down in the minutes before Nelson’s set. One of the biggest concerns to everyone was the potential of music being leaked while filming at these venues with live crowds. To counter that, we came up with an earwig playback setup with no amplification. The performers could hear the music and the singing was recorded live, but the crowd couldn’t hear the vocals or music beyond the first couple of rows. We modified this system for Glastonbury where we had to be super mobile, we were a skeleton crew with only four minutes to set up and shoot. We had the festival’s monitor mixer put the instrument playback into Cooper’s wedge at a low level, and he sang live (unamplified) in front of one hundred thousand festival goers. The crowds were always so fantastic and excited even though they couldn’t hear much of anything. There were some fun headlines at the time about technical difficulties causing the lack of amplification, but it was all a part of the plan to keep the music as secret as possible.

Stagecoach opening scene.

We shot performances all over, from Coachella and Stagecoach, to Glastonbury, the Shrine Auditorium, the Greek Theatre, the Orpheum, to the Palm Springs Convention Center, a few small nightclubs and a drag bar. We had to be prepared to record absolutely everything live, which meant up to sixty-one tracks of audio at any given time. I used two Midas M32R mixers with a digital stage snake, each mixer has thirty-two inputs and by combining them via Dante into the Sound Devices 970, I could record all the tracks needed. We muted the musicians’ instruments through the amps but still recorded the feeds for post to use. To help capture the atmosphere, we used a DPA 5100 surround sound mic in the crowd and two shotgun mics, one at stage left and right, aimed at the crowd for their reactions. We created a room mapping whenever possible by recording an impulse response for post to be able to take the original studio instrument recordings and balance them to sound like they were recorded live with the vocals in each venue.

Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures

For the track “Always Remember Us This Way” (one of my favorites in this film), Gaga requested a digital grand piano so we could record the piano isolated from the vocals. We were able to take a stereo feed from the digital piano to track her playing, record the vocals cleanly, and keep the music from being heard by the crowd.

For regular production days, we were a three-man crew: myself, Craig Dollinger (Boom Operator), and Michael Kaleta (Sound Utility.) On music days, we had Nick Baxter on our team as our Pro Tools music editor and monitor mixer Antoine Arvizu. Each music day was like throwing a concert, and the whole team was needed to set up and break down the mics, cabling, stage snakes, in ears and earwigs. These days, we generally had a three-hour pre-call, to set up the wedges, mic all the instruments, and get everything patched to a Midas digital stage box. We used the stage box to split the signal of all the feeds, one to me at the cart and the other to a monitor mixer at the side of stage. The monitor mixer would control the reverb that was heard by Gaga and Cooper via Phonak Earwigs. We would also route the singing and music to the band through earwigs for the concerts with live crowds since the music and singing were not amplified. At the cart, I worked off of the two Midas M32R’s recording to two Sound Devices 970’s. I prepared for sixty-four tracks, our highest track count was sixty-one. We were also joined on set by Jason Ruder, there to observe our recording process during music performances to make handling all the tracks in post as easy as possible.

Music interacting with the script was so important to Cooper’s vision of the film. He wanted the songs to be a character in the film and each word of the music there to propel and reflect the story. To help achieve this, multiple songs would often be performed in one setup so that he could have the options available when he went into editing. On our end, we built each Pro Tools session to include nearly all of the film’s music so we could easily and quickly switch from song to song at a moment’s notice, with some songs being added the day of shooting.

There’s always a sense of fun on set when you do a music-driven film. In between setups, the band would jam out and occasionally, Matthew Libatique would grab a camera and start rolling on the action. I was often glued to my seat staring at the monitors as we could just start rolling at any minute. This film is one of the most rewarding I’ve worked on to date, filled with plenty of technical challenges and lots of fun. Bradley Cooper’s directorial leadership always let you know you were an integral part of something special. It was an honor to work with both he and Lady Gaga, two incredibly talented and passionate artists.

The Cart
Venue 2 and 970’s
Digital stage snake for surround recording
All the ins and outs from the stage
Track Count 970 Screen

Mission: Impossible – Fallout

Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt in MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – FALLOUT, from Paramount Pictures and Skydance.

Mission: Impossible – Fallout marks my second outing in the series and third film with Tom Cruise. I had previously worked on Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation, but collaborated with a new team for this latest installment. My longstanding colleagues, Steve Finn and Anthony Ortiz, who worked on Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation, both decided to make the break to mixing. I’m pleased to say both were successful, and hopefully, they learned as much from me as I learned from them in the years we spent together.

by Chris Munro

Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt and Henry Cavill as August Walker in MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – FALLOUT, from Paramount Pictures and Skydance.

Previous experience has taught me to expect the unexpected; after all, anything can happen. So, upon starting pre-production, it came as no surprise when one of my first meetings with Tom Cruise was at the London Heliport in Battersea. It took place as Cruise piloted the helicopter that took us to an airfield close to the studios. He explained there was a plan for a helicopter-chase sequence in the film where he needed to be able to pilot the helicopter with no visible headset or helmet. At this stage there was no script, and for some weeks, we worked with Writer/Director/Producer Christopher McQuarrie, verbally explaining the storyline. The Mission films are all about practical stunts and FX so everything has to work in real-life situations.

Fortunately, I have worked on a number of films featuring helicopters and used them as an essential means of reaching challenging locations. The most notable project, Black Hawk Down, garnered me an Academy Award for Best Sound.

Henry Cavill in MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – FALLOUT

I had previously considered using bone conduction technology, most recently on Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation for the sequence where Tom Cruise is on the outside of a giant Airbus A400M in flight. The technology has been around for years, but I learned that the military had adopted it, which greatly improved the audio quality. The challenge with older technology is that many of the sounds in speech are made in the mouth and not all transmitted through bone conduction. Without these sounds, speech can sometimes be less intelligible. The research process was quite extensive, as not all information was readily accessible. I eventually came upon a company that was developing bone conduction headsets for commercial use, but the caveat was headsets needed to be custom made. Thus, we needed to arrange for an audiologist to take impressions of Cruise’s ears and create concealed bone conduction headsets specifically for him.

Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt in MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – FALLOUT from Paramount Pictures and Skydance.

Photo: Chiabella James.

The next stage was to test if and how they would work. I set up four large powered speakers in a studio office and played back helicopter sounds at a level in which you could not hear someone speak. We then invited Tom Cruise to sit in the room with the earpieces fitted and connected to a walkie-talkie. Incidentally, the earpieces also offered a high degree of hearing protection, which would be important for anyone spending hours in a helicopter without a headset. I went outside the room with another walkie-talkie, and we were able to communicate perfectly. With the first stage complete, I now had to work out how the system would function in a helicopter.

At this stage, the model of helicopter had not been determined, though we knew that it would be one made by Airbus Industries. Speaking with Airbus engineers, I established that different helicopters may use different avionics systems, and it was not possible to modify or interfere with these in any way given it may affect airworthiness of the aircraft.

As a result, I called upon long-term collaborator Jim McBride, who has been the technical wizard on many films that I have been involved with in the past such as Black Hawk Down, Gravity, and Captain Phillips. McBride has worked in varying technical capacities on films, as well as in music, and even in a nuclear power station. McBride and I decided we needed to build totally independent self-powered interfaces that were isolated from the helicopter avionics, yet could still use the same PTT (push to talk) button on the helicopter cyclic or control stick.

Once we had prototype interfaces made, we were ready to start testing with helicopters. With the assistance of aeronautical engineers, we went back to Denham Airfield and installed our equipment in a helicopter. Pleased with the results, we sought approval from Tom Cruise and asked him to give it a try. The first thing Tom did before take-off was to call the control tower for a radio check. ATC reported good quality but were suspicious. The controller remarked he didn’t believe we were in a helicopter because it was too clear, as he couldn’t hear any engine or rotor noise. This result was due to the fact we’d used the bone conduction units fitted in Cruise’s ears with minimal pickup of background noise.

The next step was sorting how we would connect to a recorder. The limited space within the helicopter prompted us to find something that could be easily hidden when cameras were fitted.
 
We originally thought about using a radio link to connect to a hidden multitrack recorder that would also be recording 5.1 FX but wanted to avoid radio transmission within the helicopter if possible. I decided to record to Lectrosonics PDRs which would have timecode sync with cameras and could be easily hidden. We made an output on the helicopter communication interfaces for them to connect to.

Even with production not yet underway, I had put in a substantial contribution to the film. This level of prep was essential for sound efficiency and to ensure all ran smoothly. In some respects, there are similarities to sound design in the theatre, and perhaps a production sound designer would be a more appropriate title considering we no longer mix to a mono or stereo Nagra. The mixing component of our job has become less important; however, our responsibilities have increased proportionately with the advancements in technology.

The helicopter sequences were not at the start of the schedule so we still had a little time to perfect the systems. Shooting began in Paris in April of 2017 at the Grand Palais, with car and motorbike chases throughout central Paris. I was joined by UK assistants Lloyd Dudley and Jim Hok, as well as Paris-based assistant Gautier Isern, who had recently finished working with Mark Weingarten on Dunkirk.

I needed a small multitrack capability at this stage and experimented with the Zoom F8 and the DPA 5100 surround mic which we could easily hide in the BMW M5 cars. Given we had several cars with different camera rigs, their relative low cost made it possible to hide one in every car. We used radio mics on the actors, primarily so that we could record a rushes track for editorial purposes. This also allowed McQ to monitor performances in a follow vehicle. Supervising Sound Editor James Mather, his dialog editors, along with Re-recording Mixer Mike Prestwood Smith, would later decide which of the mics worked best. We also mounted transmitters on various parts of the car exterior with DPA 4160 mics to get sound FX. We followed the chases in a specially adapted high-speed-chase vehicle with antennae mounted for sound and video and remote camera heads. The van was rigged to carry McQ, DP (who also operated a remote head camera), video assist, another camera remote, and 1st ACs. We would chase the cars or motorbikes whist shooting either from cameras mounted on the action vehicles, tracking vehicles, or very often, an electric bike. We always had a team pre-rigging the next car or bike to be used after a shot was complete. Our team rigged mics on every camera tracking vehicle whether it be the Russian Arm, an electric camera bike or ATV. The rear-mounted mics on the cars and bikes were rigged close to the exhausts, while others were mounted close to the engines. I was particularly looking for FX that sounded real, knowing that sound FX editors could use these later as a base to create a much bigger soundscape. I was not always looking for super-clean FX but usually something raw that sounded more documentary style rather than super-clean FX. That said, I did usually try to record clean interior ambiences in 5.1 with the DPA 5100 surround mic.

The Grand Palais sequences were set in a big music event with lasers, light shows, and projected graphics that all had to be in sync, so we worked closely with an AV company to provide audio playback linked to a timeline based on timecode from playback to ensure continuity from shot to shot of graphics, sound, and lighting. Several weeks were spent working in Paris shooting a major action sequence alongside the River Seine. The sequence is where Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) once again meets Soloman Lane (Sean Harris). Sean had previously established that the voice of his character was quiet yet menacing. It was not easy to record during the mayhem of the wild action sequence, but we managed to capture it while retaining his performance.

Photo: David James

The following location was in Queenstown on New Zealand South Island where we started with sequences set in a medi-camp prior to shooting helicopter sequences. Steve Harris joined our crew here, as he had worked on several films in New Zealand, thus very familiar with the landscape. Many of our locations required travel by helicopter, so I needed an ultra-small shooting rig that could give me the facilities of my normal rig yet fit easily into a helicopter. I built a rig on one of the larger all-terrain Zuca carts fitted out with a Zoom F8, a custom-built aux output box with the ability to send feeds to video and comms, an IFB transmitter, a Lectrosonics VR field with six radio mic receiver channels powered by a lead acid block battery in the base.

On our first helicopter shooting day, the 1st AD told me with a grin, we would be starting with dialog on the first shot and had dialog to record from Henry Cavill hanging outside a helicopter. Fortunately, I had already taken the precaution of having bone conduction earpieces made for Henry. These were invaluable when connected to a Lectrosonics PDR to record his dialog in flight. I also needed to record sound FX inside the helicopter, and I used the smallest multitrack with timecode that I could find, the Zoom F8. We fixed a DPA 5100 5.1 microphone to the interior roof and hid the F8 under a seat. This was done so if it were caught in camera, the 5100 could look as if it were part of the helicopter. We were able to start/stop and adjust levels on the F8 without needing to access it by using the F8 controller app on an iPhone. Similar to the Paris chase sequences, I wanted the FX to sound real and not like enhanced library recordings. Thus, a little wind on Henry’s mic often added to the reality. Additionally, because the bone conduction units were largely unaffected by background noise, the 5.1 recordings could be useful even if only certain elements of the six tracks would be used.

Photo: David James

Tom Cruise always piloted his own helicopter with cameras mounted on it. Director Christopher McQuarrie would fly in another and film from at least one other camera helicopter. Because the helicopters would take off and shoot for at least thirty minutes at a time, Editor Eddie Hamilton asked if I could record McQ’s helicopter comms in addition to what I was recording of Tom and Henry for the takes. This would allow him to align with exactly what McQ was intending for each shot. I used another PDR for this because of the timecode sync capability and small size. At the end of the day, we became data wranglers downloading the various SD cards and making sound reports.

After New Zealand, we returned to the UK to shoot in studio and various London locations, eventually joined by Hosea Ntaborwa. I had mentored Hosea when he was at the National Film and TV School on behalf of BAFTA and Warner Bros. creative talent. This was one of his first jobs after graduating and since then, has become part of my regular team working with us on The Voyage of Dr. Dolittle and Spider-Man: Far from Home. We had some rather challenging locations in London and it was whilst shooting on one of these, Cruise injured his ankle.

The company went on hiatus for a few weeks, which gave me an opportunity to prepare for the HALO jump sequence. That is High Altitude Low Opening and involved Tom Cruise jumping from an aircraft at an altitude high enough to require oxygen. We had a huge wind tunnel built on the backlot in the studio so that the skydive team could plan and practice manoeuvres while
experimenting with camera angles. The wind tunnel was also useful for my first asssistant Lloyd Dudley and I to develop the system for recording Cruise during the jump. We were able to set up communications between the skydive team, McQ, camera operator, and ground safety.

The wind tunnel was incredibly noisy so we were appreciative of the fact that the bone conducting earpieces offered a high degree of hearing protection. The skydive team were amazed that we managed to achieve audible communication in the wind tunnel, which made it much easier to plan shots and make adjustments. The team warned that skydivers have been trying for years to get good recordings during the dives but that they were always battling against wind noise and that it would be impossible to record. I reminded them that this was Mission: Impossible!

When we began shooting again, many of the locations were very inhospitable to sound, but nothing I had not come across before. The team also continued on studio sets at WB studios at Leavesden.

Jim McBride testing the comms
Lloyd and Hosea
Lloyd and Chris Munro on the way to the set

During this time, I continued to prepare for the HALO jump sequence, which was to be shot in Abu Dhabi. We did a number of tests with Cruise and the skydive team jumping from a Cesna Caravan at various UK sites. What we couldn’t test was what would happen at the highest altitudes when oxygen was required, and the jump was from a giant C17 aircraft. I was concerned with safety and that the equipment we were using in both Tom and the skydiver’s helmets was intrinsically safe. The dive helmets contained lighting which could potentially ignite the oxygen, so we arranged for tests to be done in an RAF lab with all of the equipment used for the HALO jump. We also had dialog to record inside the C17 as the jump progressed from a dialog scene directly into the jump. We shot some exteriors of the C17 and interiors on the ground at RAF Brize Norton near Oxford in the UK. This at least gave us a chance to consider what we would be up against.

Eventually, the time came to travel to Abu Dhabi. My crew there was Lloyd Dudley and Hosea Ntaborwa. Lloyd concentrated mainly on looking after Tom Cruise’s bone conduction headsets and fitting Lectrosonics PDR recorders to actors. Hosea was in charge of comms for the skydive team and recording 5.1 FX in the aircraft. I was particularly interested in sounds of breathing and how that can add tension. Once we played some of these sounds for Tom, he immediately wanted it to be a major part of the soundtrack during the jump sequence. I was not looking for pristine recordings that sounded like they were shot in a studio, instead, I was interested in the raw sounds of the helmet mics and bone conducting units which could give a more realistic documentary-type sound. I was not opposed to some wind noise and realised this could add to the reality. Having original sound adds to the feeling of reality even the audience are only subconsciously aware of it. Post production was greatly contracted due to the hiatus in shooting. Supervising Sound Editor James Mather had time restraints, thus appreciated all of the raw sound FX we could give him as elements to enable his team to create the final audio to be mixed by Mike Prestwood Smith. Both have been collaborators of mine on several previous films.

In conclusion, this film involved huge leaps of faith from all parties involved. I greatly appreciate the support from Tom Cruise, Chris McQuarrie, the production team, and my team throughout. My previous experiences, intuition, along with an incredibly well-respected new team proved immensely valuable. Much of the sound was unmonitored being recorded on PDR and hidden recorders. Chris McQuarrie and the producers trusted us to deliver on Mission: Impossible – Fallout using never-before-used technology. Most importantly, Tom Cruise trusted we would develop technology that would allow him to perform stunts efficiently, safely, and wherever possible, avoid ADR in order to enhance the reality.

HALO COMMS
The original intention was to use a radio mic TX on TC with a recording facility and have each of the additional divers and camera operator have a receiver connected to helmet-fixed earpieces. When we were safety testing, one of the requests was that we did not transmit anything inside the aircraft but that it was OK to transmit as soon as the divers had exited. I argued that radio mics would be fairly low power and on legal frequencies but then realised that it may have been a mistake to try to achieve recordings and comms with the same device. Additionally, we needed ground contact when the divers reached a lower altitude so that they could be given any safety information about wind or any other issues and radio mic TX may not have enough range.

I decided to use Motorola walkie-talkies for comms mainly because they were reliable and we were familiar with them. We used finger-operated PTT (push to talk) with custom-made interfaces to connect to the Motorolas. The PTT was run inside the sleeve of each diver and operated with a finger and thumb.

For TC (shown as EH on diagram), we used a bone conduction headset in each ear. One ear was talk/listen connected to the Motorola via the PTT and the other ear was connected directly to a Lectrosonics PDR. Another PDR connected to a da-capo mic (Que audio in US?) mounted in the helmet. I chose the da-capo mic mainly because I just happened to have some and also because these are what I had successfully used in helmets on Gravity. I had to send mics for safety testing to be intrinsically safe when used in the helmet, which also had oxygen being pumped in. I immediately thought that the da-capo mics may be well sealed as they are waterproof. It was not a particularly scientific decision.

Tom Cruise as Ethan Hunt in MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE – FALLOUT, from Paramount Pictures and Skydance.

Tom Cruise’s Bone Conductive Earpieces & Microphone

I had custom-moulded bone conduction units in each of TC’s ears. It was necessary to have one in each ear to give hearing protection but also allows use of the aircraft PTT as one ear is for talking and one for listening. There is a switch on the interface that allows for either, and this was connected via the pilot’s headset connectors in the helicopter on a US NATO plug or on some aircraft a Lemo connector. Trim pots on the interface require a miniature screwdriver to adjust talk and listen levels. It is powered by an internal battery and has transformer isolation on the connection to the helicopter to ensure isolation from the helicopter avionics.

The PDR records directly from the “talk” ear for a clean track of TC and is therefore pre PTT. That is to say that even if TC is not transmitting through the aircraft radio, his voice is still recorded.

An output from the co-pilot comms socket goes to track eight of a Zoom F8 which is primarily to record 5.1 ambience within the helicopter. Track eight records all comms: the director, any communication with other aircraft, ATC, and so on.

The DPA 5100 was fixed to the inside roof of the helicopter cabin toward the rear. If ever it were inadvertently caught on camera, it looks like part of the structure. The recorder was hidden and operated by the F8 control app on an iPhone.

The PDR was stopped and started using dweedle tones within the Letrosonics PDR remote app, also from an iPhone.

Reprint: March 1953

Reprint from
International Sound Technician March 1953 Issue

The Way We Were: Mixers Past & Present (Part 1)

Overview

The past ninety years of sound recording for motion picture production has seen a steady evolution in regards to the technologies used both on set and in studios for post production. Formats used for recording sound have changed markedly over the years (with the major transitions being the move away from optical soundtracks to analog magnetic recording, and from analog magnetic to digital magnetic formats, and finally, to file-based recording). Along with these changes, there has been a steady progression in the mixing equipment used both on set for production sound, as well as re-recording. Beginning with fairly crude two input mixers in the late 1920’s, up to current digital consoles boasting ninety-six or more inputs, mixing consoles have seen vast changes in both their capabilities and technology used within. In the article, we will take a look at the evolution of mixing equipment, and how it has impacted recording styles.

In The Beginning

If you were a production mixer in the early 1930’s, you didn’t have a lot of choices when it came to sound mixing equipment. For starters, there were only two manufacturers, Western Electric and RCA. Studios did not own the equipment. Instead, it was leased from the manufacturers, and the studio paid a licensing fee for the use of the equipment (readily evidenced by the inclusion of either “Western Electric Sound Recording” or “Recorded by RCA Photophone Sound System” in the end credits). Both the equipment, as well as the related operating manuals, were tightly controlled by the manufacturers. For example, Western Electric manuals had serial numbers assigned to them, corresponding to the equipment on lease by the studio. These were large multi-volume manuals, consisting of hundreds of pages of detailed operating instructions, schematics, and related drawings. If you didn’t work at a major studio, there is no way you would even be able to obtain the manuals (much less comprehend their contents).

Western Electric film sound operating manuals ca. 1930

Early on, both Western Electric and RCA established operations that were specifically dedicated to sound recording for film, with sales and support operations located in Hollywood and New York. Manufacturing for RCA was done at its Camden, NJ, facilities. Western Electric opted to do its initial manufacturing at both the huge Hawthorne Works facility on the south side of Chicago, as well as its Kearny, New Jersey, plant. These facilities employed thousands of people already engaged in the manufacturing of telephone and early sound reinforcement equipment, as well as related manufacturing of vacuum tubes and other components used in sound equipment.

The engineering design for early sound equipment was done by engineers who came out of sound reinforcement and telephony design and manufacturing, as these areas of endeavor already had shared technologies related to speech transmission equipment. (Optical sound recording was still in its infancy at this stage though, and required a completely different set of engineering skills.)

Western Electric 22C console. While this particular console was designed for broadcast, with some modification to monitoring, it was also the basis of film recording mixers.

With the rapid adoption of sound by the major studios beginning in April 1928 (post The Jazz Singer), there was no time for manufacturers to develop equipment from the ground up. If they were to establish and maintain a foothold in the motion picture business, they had to move as quickly as possible. Due to the high cost and complexities of manufacturing, engineers were encouraged by management to adapt existing design approaches used for broadcast and speech reinforcement equipment, as well as disc recording, to the needs of the motion picture business. As such, it was not unusual to see mixing and amplifier equipment designed for broadcast and speech reinforcement show up in a modified form for film recording.

Examples of these shared technologies are evident in nearly all of the equipment manufactured by both RCA and Western Electric (operating under their Electrical Research Products division). While equipment such as optical recorders and related technology had to be designed from the ground up, when it came to amplifiers, mixers’ microphones and speakers, manufacturers opted to adapt what they could from their current product lineup to the needs of the motion picture sound field. This is particularly evident in the equipment manufactured by RCA, which had shared manufacturing facilities for sound mixing equipment, microphones, loudspeakers and related technology used in the broadcast and sound reinforcement fields.

It was not unusual to see equipment originally designed for broadcast (and later, music recording) show up in the catalogs of equipment for film sound recording all the way through the early 1970’s.

Design Approaches

While the amplifier technology used in early sound mixing equipment varied somewhat between manufacturers, much of the overall operational design philosophy for film sound mixers remained the same all the way up through the mid to late 1950’s, when the stranglehold that RCA and Western Electric had on motion picture business began to be eaten away by the development of magnetic recording. (The sole standout being Fox, who had developed its own Fox-Movietone system.) New magnetic technologies (first developed by AEG in Germany in 1935), began gaining a foothold after the end of WWII, and players such as Ampex, Nagra, Magnecord, Magnasync, Magna-Tech, Fairchild, Stancil-Hoffman, Rangertone, Bach-Auricon, and others began to enter the field. Unlike RCA and Western Electric, these manufacturers were willing to sell their equipment outright to studios, and didn’t demand the licensing fees that were associated with the leasing arrangements of RCA and Western Electric.

RCA BC-5 console. Another of the consoles made by RCA for broadcast, but adapted in various configuration for film use.

Despite these advances, RCA and Western Electric were still the major suppliers for most film sound recording equipment for major studios well into the mid-sixties and early seventies, with upgraded versions of their optical recorders (which had been developed at significant cost) in the late 1940’s still being used to strike optical soundtracks for release prints. Both RCA and Western Electric developed “modification kits” for their existing dubbers and recorders, whereby mag heads and the associated electronics were added to film transports, thereby alleviating the cost of a wholesale replacement of all the film transport equipment. Much of this equipment remained in use at many facilities up until the 1970’s, when studios began taking advantage of high-speed dubbers with reverse capabilities.

Westrex RA-1485 mixer in “tea cart” console. Note the interphone on the left for communication with the recordist.

The 1940’s

After the initial rush to marry sound to motion pictures, the 1940’s saw a steady series of improvements in film sound recording, mostly related to optical sound recording systems and solving problems related to synchronous filming on set, such as camera noise, arc light noise, poor acoustics, and related issues. In 1935, Siemens in Germany had developed a directional microphone which provided a solution to sounds coming from off set.

Disney also released the movie Fantasia, a groundbreaking achievement that featured the first commercial use of multi-channel surround sound in the theater. Using eight(!) channels of interlocked optical sound recorders for the recording of the music score and numerous equipment designs churned out by engineers at RCA, it can safely be said that the “Fantasound”  system represented the most significant advance in film sound during the 1940’s. However, except for the development of the three-channel (L/C/R) panpot, the basic technology utilized for the mixing consoles remained mostly unchanged.

Likewise, functionality of standard mixing equipment for production sound saw few advances, except for much-needed improvements to amplifier technology (primarily in relation to problems due to microphonics in early tube designs). Re-recording consoles, however, began to see some changes, mostly in regards to equalization. Some studios began increasing the count of dubbers as well, which required an increase in the number of inputs required. For the most part, though, the basic operations of film sound recording and re-recording remained as they were in the previous decade.

Nagra BMII mixer. This was one of the first portable mixers to include powering for condenser mics as part of the mixer design.
Sela portable mixer designed for use with Nagra recorders. Incorporating T-power for mics, and low-frequency EQ, this was an industry standard for years.

The 1950’s

While manufacturers such as RCA and Western Electric attempted to extend the useful life of the optical sound equipment that they had sunk a significant amount of development money into, by the late 1950’s, the technology for production sound recording had already begun making the transition to ¼” tape with the introduction of the Nagra III recorder. Though other manufacturers such as Ampex, Rangertone, Scully, RCA, and Fairchild had also adapted some of their ¼” magnetic recorders for sync capability, all of these machines were essentially studio recorders that simply had sync heads fitted to them. While the introduction of magnetic recording significantly improved the quality of sound recording, it would remain for Stefan Kudelski to introduce the first truly lightweight battery-operated recorder capable of high-quality recording, based on the recorders that he originally designed for broadcast field recording. This was a complete game-changer, and eliminated the need for a sprocketed film recorder or studio tape machine to be located off-set somewhere (frequently in a truck), with the attendant need for and AC power or bulky battery boxes and inverters.

Westrex RA-1424 stereo mixer. This mixer, introduced in 1954, was made in six different configurations, equipped with either four or six inputs, and variations on buss assignments. This was most likely developed in response to the need for true 3-channel

Later, Uher and Stellevox would also introduce similar battery- operated ¼” recorders that could also record sync sound. Up until this point, standard production mixing equipment had changed little in terms of design philosophies from the equipment initially developed in the early 1930’s (with the exception being some of the mixing equipment developed for early stereo recording during the early 1950’s for movies such as The Robe). Despite the development of the Germanium transistor by Bell Laboratories in 1951, most (if not all) film sound recording equipment of the 1950’s was still of vacuum tube design. Not only did this equipment require a significant source of power for operation, they were, by nature, heavy and bulky as a result of the power transformers and audio transformers that were a standard feature of all vacuum tube audio designs. In addition, they produced a lot of heat!

Most “portable” mixers of the 1950’s were still based largely on broadcast consoles manufactured by RCA, Western Electric (ERPI), Altec, and Collins. Again, all of vacuum tube design. The first commercial solid-state recording console wouldn’t come around until 1964, designed by Rupert Neve. A replacement for the venerated Altec 1567A tube mixer didn’t appear until the introduction of the Altec 1592A in the 1970’s.

French-made Girardin tube mixer

A common trait amongst all of these designs was that nearly all of them were four input mixers. The only EQ provided was a switchable LF rolloff or high-pass filter. There were typically, no pads or first stage mic preamp gain trim controls. The mic preamps typically had a significant amount of gain, required to compensate for the low output of most of the ribbon and dynamic mics utilized in film production at the time (while condenser mics existed, they also tended to have relatively low output as well).

All had rotary faders, usually made by Daven. And except for the three-channel mixers expressly designed for stereo recording in the 1950’s, all had a single mono output.

Re-recording consoles were of course much larger, with more facilities for equalization and other signal processing, but even these consoles seldom had more than eight to twelve inputs per section.

The 1960’s

While the 1950’s saw some significant advances in the technology of sound recording and reproduction, with the exception of the introduction of stereo sound (which was typically for CinemaScope roadshow releases), there had not been any really significant advances in recording methods since the transition from optical to magnetic recording. Power amplifiers and speaker systems had somewhat improved, boosting the performance of cinema reproduction. However, most mixing consoles relied on circuit topologies that were based on equipment from the 1940’s and 1950’s, with some minor improvements in dynamic range and signal-to-noise ratio.

Westrex RA-1518-A stereo mixer. Note the early ingenious use of straight line faders, which are actually connected to Daven rotary pots on the underside of the panel

It was during this period that technologies developed for music and broadcast began to seep into the area of film sound, and the approach to console designs began to change. The most notable shift was a move from the tube-based designs of the 1950’s to solid-state electronics, which significantly reduced the size and weight of portable consoles, and also for the first time, allowed for a design approach that could use batteries as a direct source of power, without the need for inverters or generators required to power traditional vacuum tube designs. This opened up a significant range of possibilities that had not existed before.

Sennheiser M101 mixer. Another of the early entries to solid-state portable mixers.

With the introduction of solid-state condenser mics, designers began to incorporate microphone powering as part their overall design approach to production mixers, which eliminated the need for cumbersome outboard power supplies.

Some mixers also began to include mic preamp gain trims as part the overall design approach (also borrowed from music consoles of the era), which made it easier to optimize the gain and fader settings for a particular microphone, and the dynamics of a scene.

The 1960’s would also see the introduction of straight-line faders (largely attributed to music engineer Tom Dowd  during his stint at Atlantic Records in New York). In the film world, straight-line faders showed up first in re-recording consoles, which could occupy a larger “footprint.” However, they were slow to be adopted for production recording equipment. This was due in part to some resistance on the part of sound mixers who had grown up on rotary faders (with some good-sized bakelite knobs on them!), but also due to the fact that early wire-wound straight-line faders (such as Altec and Langevin) fared rather poorly in harsh conditions, requiring frequent cleaning.

Still, even by the end of the 1960’s, not much had changed in terms of the overall approach to production recording. Four input mixers were still the standard in most production sound setups, with little or no equalization. But the landscape was beginning to shift. While RCA and Westrex were still around, they had lost their dominance in the production world of film (although RCA still had a thriving business in theater sound service arena).

Things were about to change however.

Part 2 will continue in the next edition.
–Scott D. Smith CAS

Adapting to 4K & Beyond

by James Delhauer 

When looking at the history of the technology that defines our industry, the acceleration of progress that has occurred in the recent past is truly staggering. In 1953, the National Television System Committee (NTSC) introduced the color television broadcasting format, which is colloquially known today as NTSC Standard Definition. Though minor variations on the format were introduced over time, it remained mostly unchanged until the first high-definition television standards were officially adopted in the United States more than forty years later in 1994. But just twenty years after that, in 2014, that resolution was made obsolete when the first digital streaming services began to widely distribute content in a 4K Ultra-High Definition (UHD) television resolution. Though 4K UHD is the current highest standard of content distribution, current speculation suggests that mainstream adoption of even larger 8K displays will begin in the United States in 2023 and that distribution platforms will start officially supporting it shortly thereafter. If accurate, this would mean that the amount of time between home media standards has halved between each leap forward. And in the not-so-distant future, that could be a very real challenge.
 
A digital image is made up of what we call pixels—tiny dots that come together in rows and columns to make up a single image. What we call resolution is a measurement of the number of pixels in a given image. NTSC Standard Definition format images are made up of six hundred and forty vertical lines and four hundred and eighty horizontal lines, commonly represented as 640×480. Though a variety of different high-definition formats do exist, the one referred to as True HD increased those figures to one thousand, nine hundred and twenty vertical lines by one thousand and eighty horizontal lines. This is referred to as 1920×1080 or simply 1080 for short. This increase in pixels results in substantially more dots being used to make up the same picture, allowing for more detail, precision, and color shading when replicating what a camera’s sensor captures, making for a more nuanced product.  
 
But while we all love to be dazzled by the absolute clarity, color, and sharpness that high-resolution imagery can offer, there are very real logistical quandaries that filmmakers need to consider. For Local 695 data engineers in particular, whose responsibilities can include media playback, on-set chroma keying, off-camera recording, copying files from camera media to external storage devices, backup and redundancy creation, transcoding, and syncing, digital real estate is a growing concern. At four times the number of pixels as Full High Definition, 4K UHD means four times the amount of data is captured over the same amount of time. The impending move to 8K will multiply this amount by another factor of four, as 8K is double the number of both horizontal and vertical lines of 4K and not just double the number of pixels. In practical terms, productions will need to spend sixteen times as much money on media.  
 
But drive space isn’t the only issue. Just because our data quantities are increasing does not mean that the films and series we make can accommodate turnaround times that are four and sixteen times longer. Therefore, we need faster drives and more powerful computers.

In simplest terms, a hard drive’s read and write speeds determine how quickly it can access the data stored within and add new data onto itself. For data engineers, this is of critical importance when transferring media from one location, such as a camera card, to another, such as a production shuttle. A standard spinning disk hard drive’s speed is determined based on how fast the disk inside of it spins. Typical work drives spin approximately seventy-two hundred times per minute when brand new. In theoretical terms, these drives are capable of transferring between eighty and one hundred and sixty megabytes of data per second. Unfortunately, even at this speed, these drives are not always suited for high-definition work—let alone the more intensive labors of 4K and beyond. A convenient way to get around the problem is through a process known as Redundant Array of Independent Disks, or RAID. Though RAIDing can be done in a variety of ways, the basic concept is that multiple drives are used to accomplish a single task. By using two hard drives (or more) instead of one, the task being performed can use the performance speed of each drive simultaneously. In live broadcast environments, it is common to use RAID configurations that are making use of anywhere from four to sixteen hard drives at once in order to ingest multiple cameras’ worth of media simultaneously.

However, while those speeds are impressive and more up to the challenge of high-resolution production, they do come with serious drawbacks. Every hard drive introduced into the configuration represents a potential point of failure in the RAID array. In a simple RAID configuration, the loss of a single hard drive could mean the loss of all footage contained within the array. More complex configurations take this into account and create redundancies but these require additional hard drives, returning us to the issue of real estate. Newer solid state hard drives—media devices that have no moving parts and therefore, don’t rely on disk speed—may represent a possible solution to the RAID issue in time. Though they are currently significantly more expensive (a single terabyte 7200rpm hard disk drive can be bought for as little as $44, whereas a solid state drive of the same size and brand will run you $230), they are significantly faster at performing the same tasks. This theoretically means that fewer drives could go into a single RAID configuration, reducing the points of failure in the array. Moreover, with no mechanical parts to jam or degrade over time, they may be less prone to failure in the first place. Unfortunately, we will need to wait for production costs to bring retail prices on solid state media down before this becomes a viable alternative.

This is all assuming that a hard drive is not limited in any way by its connection speed to the computer with which it is communicating. The physical port that a hard drive uses to interface with a computer may have a speed limitation completely unrelated to the drive’s. The most common type of port, USB 3.0, has a theoretical limit of five gigabits per second, with one gigabit equaling approximately one-eighth of the more commonly measured gigabyte. A single spinning disk drive does not read or write faster than that and so there is no problem.

However, an array of drives working together can easily exceed that limit, at which point, data is going through a choke point when passing through the wire connecting a computer to a hard drive. At the time of writing this article, the fastest connection port on the market is tied between Thunderbolt 3 and 40g Ethernet. These two port types both have theoretical maximums of 40gbps, though neither has seen widespread adoption within the industry at this time.

All of that being said, engineers don’t just need to be able to move data around faster if we are to keep up with the demands of higher resolution. It is of equal importance that we process it more quickly too. Since working with ultra-high definition and larger formats requires a prohibitive amount of computer processing power, our editor friends in Local 700 rarely do it. Instead, they make use of a process known as “Offline to Online Editing,” where they use lower resolution proxy file copies of the camera media when assembling their projects and then swap out those proxies for the original high-resolution camera media when preparing to color grade and deliver. Where do those proxy files come from?

Us.

Local 695 data engineers can be tasked with creating these proxies on set, which necessitates being able to work with the raw, high-quality footage captured by the camera. This means more powerful and efficient computers are becoming necessary. There are several factors that determine how powerful a computer is for our purposes. Processor speed, memory, graphics memory, hard drive speed, and connection speed all need to be taken into account. For these reasons, and a few others, the majority of the industry has become reliant on Apple computers.

Unfortunately, Apple’s professional line of computers tend to stagnate for long periods of time. The Mac Pro, Apple’s line of professional grade editing machines, has remained unchanged since 2013. The company has announced a replacement, tentatively to be released in 2019 and a stopgap solution was introduced in 2017 when the company unveiled the iMac Pro but these computers are not cheap. An introductory iMac Pro costs $4999 while a fully upgraded machine can be bought for as much as $13,200. And this assumes the use of only one machine at a time.

While the world of major motion pictures has largely embraced the move from lower viewing resolutions to higher ones, with digital cinema cameras recording in 6K and 8K resolutions already, television has yet to catch up with the current Ultra-High Definition standards. In the United States, many series still record in high definition. It’s understandable when the sheer volume of footage is taken into consideration. While feature films record enough footage to assemble a presentation lasting between ninety minutes and three hours, television series spanning multiple seasons can last hundreds of episodes. The need to process and preserve all of that footage requires a staggering amount of resources. Doing all of that in 4K or 8K makes it an even more monumental challenge. But as the cost of 4K televisions, computer monitors, and even cellphone screens continue to plummet and as 8K displays are introduced into the market, our audience is going to demand that this challenge be met.

These concerns are not new. The jump from standard definition to high definition presented the same obstacles in the late 1990s. The new factor at play here is time. While we, as an industry, could no doubt rise to the growing needs of 4K production with time, the advent of the 8K world is already within eyesight. How far behind that is the realm of 16K? Another ten years? Or maybe just another five? It will be interesting to see at what point the innovation of one avenue of technology collides with the reality of another.

My Life as a Commercial Sound Mixer

My Life as a Commercial Sound Mixer

by Crew ChamberlainI

Crew Chamberlain at Disney Ranch

My name is Crew Chamberlain, yes, that is my real name, ever since the spring of 1952 when I was born in Fullerton, Calif., at the edge of what we now call the “Thirty Mile Zone,” a child of the baby boom, as well as a fourth-generation Californian, from a large family that settled in and around Orange County. Many of them worked the “Oil Patch” for the Standard Oil Company, others had their own businesses, but not one of them worked in Hollywood or even knew someone who did. Media back then was a black-and-white television (five stations), radio (lots of stations), and a Saturday-afternoon trip to the Fox Fullerton to see the latest double feature for thirty-five cents.

As much as I loved the films and TV that I grew up with, it never occurred to me that there was a system of people, places, and companies that made the content I consumed. We just loved the grand and silly movies like Journey to the Center of the Earth, The Nutty Professor, The Great Escape, or TV shows like The Twilight Zone and The Man From U.N.C.L.E.. I was totally oblivious to the process of film production. That started changing in high school where I was a proud C student. I only enjoyed having fun, playing drums in my garage band, body surfing, drawing, or painting.

Crew on his first multitrack gig, 14 ball players and two DA88’s

In my sophomore year at Sunny Hills High School, an art teacher gave our class a unique assignment. She had us paint patterns on exposed 16mm film (a clear strip) which we then projected in class and played songs to. We  all liked this so much we asked to do it again and again. She next suggested if we could get access to an 8mm camera, we could try and make a short film. We did and it was terrible. Not a Spielberg in the bunch, but we had a blast doing it. That little spark started a slow smoldering interest of film within me. With parental pressure to go to college, the Vietnam War spinning out of control, and a very motivational mandatory draft, I discovered that there was a thing called “Film School.” Not the ubiquitous film schools of today, at the time there were only three: NYU, UCLA, and USC. It took me a year at ASU to get my grades up, but with some hustle and a lot of luck, I got into the USC School of Cinema in 1971. I had found my calling.

Nike commercial for Joe Pytka in San Francisco; in the late ’80s (from left) with Tom Stern by the arc, Jane Hampton, script, Roger Daniel, mixer, and Crew.

The USC Film School was a nerdy endeavor in the eyes of the student body back then, until the release of American Graffiti by fellow Cinema School alum George Lucas during my second year. All of a sudden, everyone knew and thought highly of our little dilapidated barn and stable complex on the corner of campus. What a deep dive I took. We lived, breathed, and endlessly discussed cinema. I watched at least two films a day from every genre and era. A very talented group of professors like Mel Sloan, Ken Miura, and Drew Casper engaged and enlightened us. We had to make many films, write a screenplay, and learn the nuts and bolts of the gear. Film cameras! Sound recording on Nagras with microphones! History & criticism!

Editing … sweet editing. A filmmaker’s last chance to make a story into something. That hands-on creativity is what I loved the most. That was going to be my choice of career path after college. I would become an editor and of course, some day a director….

After USC, I landed a job at Wexler Films (not related to Haskell or Jeff) that made medical and health-related shorts for high school education departments. I was an ‘assistant editor,’ but really a PA. On shoot days, I did everything needed, including the sound recording for interviews on a Nagra 4L with a 415 or Sony ECM 50 lavs. I loved production shoot days and these interactions lead to other sound gigs. Soon I was sound recording on docs, interviews, and low-budget films. I also started booming for other mixers which seemed very natural to me as I had the coordination and enough sound knowledge to get it going. Looking back, the progression was a steady one. I went from working on drive-in-level Corman films, to a John Cassavetes movie (Opening Night), to Albert Brooks’ first film (Real Life).

For the first thirteen years of my career, I pursued films above all else and landed some good ones. I was fortunate to get better and better movies and experience with some of the best mixers of the day, Jeff Wexler, Jim Webb, Art Rochester, and Keith Wester. Between all the films that I did, I boomed for many good commercial mixers, but mostly Roger Daniel. As much as I appreciated the work, I wasn’t a fan of commercial shoots. No one whoever went to film school wanted to do commercials.

Films were the goal and I did about as well as possible thanks to Jeff Wexler and Don Coufal mentoring me. Thankfully, Roger continued to hire me between films and showed me many of the valuable aspects to commercials that I had overlooked. Like the time/money ratio.

It all came into focus for me in 1986. I was thirty-five years old with a wife and two kids under five years old that I loved and I wasn’t able to be a full-time father and husband for. That year, I was on location for nine of the prior twelve months. I took a good long look around, I felt good about where I’d been and all I had learned and decided that a change was needed and my path forward was going to be in the commercial realm. At least until the kids grew up, I consoled myself.

Commercials. Yep, commercials. Still hard to believe. When I got in the IATSE in 1977, film was the undisputed king of the crop. Television was a different beast than today, closer to the old factory system of the studios that were cranking out a steady stream of cop shows or three-camera sitcoms, and commercials were, well, commercials. The stigma was understandable as commercials were formulaic and square at best. That all started changing in the mid-’80s as a new sensibility and atheistic took hold. Directors like Joe Pytka, Ridley and Tony Scott, Rick Levine, Bob Giraldi, Adrian Lyne and others brought a cinematic look and approach to the process. An entertaining thirty- or sixty-second movie/story was the new direction. These directors all did commercials, as well as the emerging music videos and feature films. For them,  work was work. Another day to practice and perfect their craft was the sensibility. Money was a motivator too. The commercial stigma started to evaporate a bit.

For a Sound Man (that’s what we were called and mostly were back then), the commercial work left the two walled sets on quiet stages and more often ventured out to practical locations where the challenges were more difficult, exactly like film and TV. The work was still ninety percent one boom and a mono Nagra and luckily one camera, so our success rate was high. Roger and I did so well that I was working more days a year than I had prior, but the big difference being I was home every night with my family. I was happy and seldom looked back. On commercial shoots back then, many a day was short for the Sound Department. We’d have a later call, record our part, and go home early. A lot of six- to eight-hour days in the eighties and early nineties. The glory days as it were.

Crew (left) with William (Bill) MacPherson working on The Milagro Beanfield War in Truchas, New Mexico, in 1986

Roger had a very loyal clientele of the top players in the commercial world, the LA, NYC, and London production companies and directors called him first. I nicknamed a lot of people and I called Roger “The Godfather.” Not that original but true. He handed off many, many gigs to other mixers. I and others benefited greatly from him doing this to keep his customers satisfied. That’s how I moved up to mixing in late 1987. I started covering for Roger on the weekends when Pytka would fly a small group up to Santa Rosa to do “Bartles & Jaymes” commercials. Simple shoots: A Nagra, a 415, and a radio mic. Only one of the two actors spoke. As much as I loved booming, the handwriting was on the wall and by the end of 1988, I bought two used Nagra 4.2’s and a stereo Sela from 20th Century Fox, a Lectro Quad Box with 195’s in it and six Comteks. I already owned two Schoeps MK 41’s. So there I was, a Commercial Mixer.

Crew on the set of the 1985 film Prizzi’s Honor; the 1986 film Down and Out in Beverly Hills with Matisse, the dog, and Clint Rowe, dog trainer

Hard to believe it was ever that simple. I continued to cover for Roger most of the time but I soon got new clients of my own.

Crew is booming Nick Nolte and Jamie Anderson is the cam operator.

We were working nonstop and I learned so much about being a team leader because Roger was my sign post and guru. As a mixer, I rely on my boom ops to run the set and I run the gear, get the calls, baby-sit the production people, agency, and clients. I have been fortunate to have so much help from my boom op friends when I started, pros like Steve Bowerman, Randy Johnson, Jim Stuebe, Mychael Smith, later with Pam Raklewicz, Dan Kent, my brother Moe, Alenka Pavlin, Anna Delanzo, Peter Commans, Bryan Whooley, and for the last eighteen years, my niece Marydixie Kirkpatrick. My two sons Case and Cole even boom for me now and again as they are up to speed in our unique world of production sound recording for picture. With that kind of help, it has been easy and fun to do my end of the job all these years. I want two qualities in a teammate, a good work ethic and the ability to find the humor each and every day in the absurd work we do. These women and men are all champs in this regard and I owe them my successful career. While we had some killer days, it never seemed like work, always an adventure.
 
The work. It is really no different technically than film or TV. This is as true in today’s multitrack workflow as it was with a mono Nagra and a boom, maybe a radio or two. The biggest difference between long form or episodic media creation and the thirty-second epic is that sound is a two-person department 99.9 percent of the time. To do our job successfully, we have to pull together to get whatever needs doing done so that “waiting on sound” is never heard. The division of labor is equal, running/wrapping cable, putting down sound blankets, etc. We have to be ahead of the curve as much as possible. On any given day, the cooperation with other departments gets limited due to the time constraints on all of us, so when help is needed, we have to request it early when it can be accommodated, not after we set up a shot. This is true for all the departments in commercial production. With only a storyboard and a few confused conversations with an often overwhelmed production manager, we all show up at a location with sixty-five other craftspeople and make a commercial. We work not only for the director (like films and TV), but also the ten to twenty agency people and clients.

This aspect of the work is what took me a long time to come to terms with. Often these fine people have little or no filmmaking experience or just enough to be dangerous. If you let it, this fact alone will make your life hard, perhaps joyless. Communication is essential in our commercial world as we try to put their fears to rest and assure them it will be great. Then we tear it down and do it all again the next day with a different crew and for a different director and client in some high-rise or on nasty a pig farm. Like our brothers and sisters in TV and film, we work at every location imaginable. Hot or cold, often both in the same fourteen- to eighteen-hour day, as we do our best to make it sound like it looks. It still surprises me that this system works as well as it does.

Shooting in Downtown Los Angeles.

Our simple workflows of the eighties and nineties have all transformed into the new modern work style of multi-camera shoots, with all sorts of rigs to move cameras everywhere, and no money and time to do what is on a storyboard, so sadly we have even less discipline and protocol than before and therefore, sound wires them all to their own tracks as we try to create useful mixes for the director, agency, and the editor in post production. Still, we do this with a two-person Sound Department, even though it would be a full day for three people.

The key for my team is the ability to look two, three steps ahead of what we read on paper and are told by production and actively stay evolved on set, and then have the gear to do almost anything that comes our way. What starts as one woman talking on the phone can morph into a car-to-car shot with four people singing a song as they drive down the road with a video village bus trailing along with always helpful suggestions. In my experience, this wouldn’t happen in TV or film without advanced warning, permits, and sides. Not so in commercials. When it happens and it will, the response “I can’t” is not an option as far as I’ve ever seen. Somehow we need to make it happen. Our video assist brothers know this all too well. They deal with unrealistic expectations and demands all the time. We  help each other. I’ve always been there for them as they have been there for me. It’s been an education to have witnessed the introduction of video assist in the late seventies and the evolution into the modern-day NLE-based multi-cam systems we have today. Really a remarkable group of people who made this happen like John Hill, all the Cogswells, the Hawks, Willow Jenkins, Tom Myrick and his gang, and Cal Evans who makes it fun regardless the shoot.

Marydixie Kirkpatrick and Crew Chamberlain on the docks in San Pedro in December 2017.

I know for many, the uncertainties of the day in the commercial world can be stressful but whether it is a personal defect or talent in me, I really like what I do. I may work twenty days in a row, then have fifteen days off. I can always say I’m booked if I’m called for a rap music night shoot in Palmdale. I always try to pass any job I can’t or won’t do to a member of my close network but I have little control where production will go after calling me.

Some in production want a known person to do the sound, others just want to cut a deal and sadly, there are those in our community who think low balling on rates and gear is a smart move. There are a lot of sound people in LA, so the competition is always there and at times, adversarial and short-sighted by a few, but most of our community is on the up and up and play by the unwritten rule that we never actively try and steal an account if a job comes to us from another mixer or undercut their rate.

Crew (right) with his brother Moe Chamberlain

My favorite aspect of working on commercials is the people we get to work with as they pass through our arena, be they the “Hot” new cinematographer, or the old “Pro” you’ve known for thirty years and their talented crews. Also, the energetic young women and men just starting their careers in Art, Hair, Wardrobe, and Production Departments who are fun to be around and prove that hope springs eternal. The athletes and stars can be fun but for me, the crews are the best part of the job. Ageism, while very real in the workforce in general, seems less so for a mixer. At sixty-six, I am often a decade or two older than most of those I work with. I enjoy the energy and modern culture they expose me to and for those who are interested, the sound and production knowledge I’m able to pass on to them.

While it would be impossible for someone to follow my career path today, that world is long gone and the future of commercials seems destined to a slow demise, as the world of new media is expanding, I do think a rewarding career can be had. Hopefully, the lessons of the past might be helpful for those going forward in what we call Hollywood. At some point in the next four years, I will hang up my headphones and get out of the way. I will do so knowing I met and worked alongside many of the most interesting and talented people in the film business and had a lot of fun doing so. And for the record, I do direct, shoot, and edit personal media projects so I guess my original game plan worked. Just not the way I thought it would.

Y-16a: The Production Sound/Video Trainee

We don’t hear a lot about Local 695’s Y-16a Production Sound/Video Trainee but it’s a position that has been finding its way onto a wider range of film and television productions as it becomes more useful to both Producers and 695 production crews.

WHAT IS THE Y-16a?
Local 695’s Y-16a Production Sound/Video Trainee can be hired to work alongside any video crew or production sound crew.  As the name suggests, this is a Trainee position, but these aren’t newbies. In fact, virtually all Y-16a’s come to the set with solid experience in the responsibilities and job tasks they’re expected to perform. Most of our Y-16a’s have extensive history in production sound and/or video and bring considerable talent to the job. For example, on a production sound crew, Y-16a’s can set up the carts, jam slates, swing an extra fishpole, lay out sound dampening carpets, set up the red lights and bell, service Comteks, prep the wireless mics, operate music playback equipment, secure gear for safe travel and lots more. Y-16a’s can provide support for video crews in all aspects of setup and video engineering.

One important thing to note is that the Trainee doesn’t replace an existing journeyman position on the crew but can be used as an additional hire to increase the efficiency of a standard-sized crew when the production company can benefit from extra help. Within one year as a Trainee, the Y-16a upgrades their status to a journeyman classification.

HOW PRODUCTIONS SAVE MONEY WITH A Y-16a
We’re very aware of the cost constraints that Producers face in every aspect of production. While one might assume that an extra hire represents additional expense, we have enough experience at this to assert with confidence that adding an extra person to the crew at the Trainee rate will consistently SAVE the company money in the form of improved production efficiency. There are many ways to pick up a few minutes on production. For example, our crews use Y-16a’s so the company doesn’t experience delays when multiple video monitors need to be relocated quickly or when there’s a large number of actors waiting to get wired and when the shooting schedule calls for challenging company moves.

Producers and some of our own members have told us that they didn’t know this option existed, but once they hired a Y-16a, it was easy to see the cost benefits when sound and video crews are able to complete the work with greater efficiency on heavily loaded days.

WHAT ABOUT THE INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE ROSTER?
The unique thing about the Y-16a is that, as a Trainee, although they must meet all of our expectations before even being considered for the job, it’s not necessary for a Y-16a to have previously completed all the requirements of placement on the Industry Experience Roster. In fact for many, it’s the days worked as a Y-16a that satisfy the Roster Placement requirements. The big bonus is that 695 members in this job classification have access to first-class apprenticeship training that would be completely unavailable anywhere else.

Y-16a Kendra Bates showing up for work

DIVERSITY IS OUR FUTURE
The film and television industry has long been known for attracting creative and energetic young people and yet for reasons we are all aware of, many of them face a variety of hurdles that can sometimes block entry into the industry.   Given those obstacles, we’re excited when we have the chance to work with studios and production companies who share our commitment to implementing diversity initiatives that extend job opportunities for underrepresented members of our community. For that reason we want to be sure that Producers know that the Y-16a job classification can be used to offer employment opportunities that might otherwise be out of reach. Industry Roster Placement can be a significant impediment for many who seek entry into the motion picture business, but since Roster Placement is not a requirement for the Y-16a, this path opens doors for women and men who struggle for a way into our industry. Local 695 welcomes the chance to partner with Producers who share the desire to build a more diverse and inclusive production community.

CASE HISTORIES
Production Mixer George Flores uses Y-16a’s whenever he can, including Iris Von Hase and Daniel Quintana on FX’s It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. He says, “On this fast-paced ensemble TV show, I believe the Producers were very happy with the Y-16a’s I brought in. One of my reasons to have had a Trainee in the Sound Department is to save time and ultimately save money and that always proves to be true.”

Y-16a Kendra Bates joined Production Mixer Scott Stolz and his crew, Alex Burstein and Cara Kovach, on The Affair for Showtime. Scott says, “Kendra was great to work with and a huge help to us and there’s no doubt that production benefited greatly from having her there.” Just a few months after wrapping, Kendra has already moved up to working as a Utility Sound Technician on Season 15 of Grey’s Anatomy.

Production Mixer Scott Harber gave Set PA Erik Altstadt a chance as a Y-16a on ABC’s Castle Season 7. Scott and the rest of his crew, Chris Walmer, Howie Erikson, and John Agalsoff, were able to share decades of production experience with Erik. And Scott says the Producers at ABC were quick to see the cost benefit in having the extra hand.

SUGGESTIONS TO VIDEO ENGINEERS AND SOUND MIXERS
Pay it forward. Use the Y-16a when you can. Help educate Producers to understand how this extra hire can save them money and open doors for young people who work so hard to get into this business. Make ours an industry of inclusivity and opportunity. And pass on your extensive knowledge and vast experience to an eager Y-16a who shares the energy, excitement, and enthusiasm that first brought you to Local 695.

695 Young Workers Committee

The Local 695 Young Workers Committee
We Work for our Members and our Community

by Aaron Eberhardt and Nathan WhitcombYWC Hike 2.jpg

The Young Workers Committee (YWC) works actively to better Los Angeles through extensive community service and political action, while also creating a truly positive environment for the younger generation of Local 695 to network with their peers. It might be the annual LA River Cleanup, hosting a local Blood Drive, or adventuring on a beautiful Saturday-morning hike with our 695 sisters and brothers. We inspire our members to get out and make a difference.

As the newly appointed co-chairs of the Young Workers Committee, myself Aaron Eberhardt and Nathan Whitcomb, would like to thank you for giving us this wonderful opportunity. We want the YWC to act as a constant resource for the younger members of the Local, but also to help any new incoming members make a smooth transition. The Young Workers Committee has toiled very hard the last couple of years to create useful, beneficial activities, and services for all the members of Local 695.

The Young Workers Committee at the LA River Cleanup

One of the best opportunities the 695 Young Workers Committee has been able to take part in is the annual LA River Cleanup. The LA River Cleanup has become a community service tradition. Over the last twenty-nine years, the organization “Friends of the LA River” has come together to help clean up the entire length of the Los Angeles River, removing over one hundred tons of trash in 2017 alone. Last year, the 695 YWC organized over twenty members all decked out in Local 695-wear, and headed to the Glendale Narrows to help. It was quite the fun time indeed, messy, but loads of fun. Descending into the LA River and grabbing old mattresses, clothes, and trash was an arduous job, but we felt that we were doing a huge service for our community. We also had a fantastic time chatting with our sisters and brothers, great stories were told, hard work was performed, and we had bonded together to truly make an impact. This community tradition continued again in 2018 with a passionate group of Local 695 members and friends who wanted to do fantastic work, while enjoying the best company of sound and video professionals around. We will be continuing this great tradition for many years to come.

We hosted a hike at the Stough Canyon Nature Center in Burbank. On a delightfully breezy Saturday morning this past spring, over fifteen came to participate in a pleasant hike up the trail. We had a wonderful time talking about our careers, sharing stories, offering useful advice, and most of all, enjoying all nature had to offer. One of the favorite moments of the hike was seeing a younger prospective member, who was hesitant about joining the Local, having a conversation with a longtime member about the benefits of joining and what it’s provided over their long career.

Aboard the Local 695 Dinner Cruise

We also continued our work with the annual Stamp Out Hunger Food Drive. The National Association of Letter Carriers conducts the Stamp Out Hunger Food Drive to help get food to those in need across Los Angeles. On May 19, 2018, the official IATSE Volunteer Day, members of Local 695, their friends, and families journeyed to the Salvation Army Warehouse in Bell, CA, to take part in the massive sorting of all the canned food before it was to be delivered to the many organizations partnered with the food drive. Members of 695 worked with other union members to help sort thousands of cans that day. We even met one of the co-chairs from Local 705’s Young Workers Committee as we were sorting some green beans. It was inspiring seeing so many union professionals working together to help the community. Needy people received the food within a couple days and it was very satisfying knowing we played a part.

The 695 YWC has many more events coming up but we’d also like to discuss our political activity. The Local cannot use our quarterly dues to promote politicians or legislation. The IATSE-Political Action Committee or PAC was created to help raise money for political activism through donations to support pro-union legislation and political representatives who work to keep our unions safe and our members’ rights protected. You have a choice to sign up for a one-time donation or contribute an amount each month to the fund. We must support pro-union legislation in any way we can, especially in these most trying political times. 

We at the YWC decided to support the IATSE-PAC fund and held a fundraiser on the Local 695 Dinner Cruise this past June 16. We set up a booth on the main deck, posted our trifold describing the benefits of the PAC Fund, and our newly designed YWC banner. We threw on our Caribbean leis and worked hard to inform our members of the benefits of donating to the PAC. We worked exceedingly hard to spread the word to our members and pulled in two hundred and thirty dollars in donations. We were extremely proud of our efforts to help raise money for this phenomenal fund and know that even the smallest little bit can make a difference. A key message we want to stress is that support can be found all around you in Local 695. You will always find a member who is willing to help you in a difficult situation or offer insightful advice.

Spring Hike at the Stough Canyon Nature Center

The YWC hosts these events to help create a bridge between the younger generation and the experienced professionals. We are here for you one hundred percent.

The Young Workers Committee is actively working with Laurence Abrams, Education and Communications Director, in creating an introductory course for incoming members. Laurence has done a phenomenal job creating the content for this course and the YWC will be there for anyone who has further questions on ways to network and become involved in the activities of the union.

Nathan and myself and the many members of the YWC, such as Ben Lazarus, Eva Rismanforoush, Evan Freeman and Chris Thueson, encourage you to become involved in the Young Workers Committee events and activities. Please reach out to Aaron Eberhardt via email at ae.sound@yahoo.com or Nathan Whitcomb at Nathan.whitcomb@gmail.com for more information. Thank you to the Board of Directors of Local 695 for the opportunity of a lifetime to work as the co-chairs of the Young Workers Committee and we look forward to creating the most beneficial opportunities to for our members.

NAB 2018 Recap

NAB 2018 RECAP What you missed, what we liked and how future entertainment is shaping new technology.

by Daron James

The annual NAB trade show held in April at the Las Vegas Convention Center brought new innovation and technology. Each year, themes emerge from the onslaught of manufacturer announcements and this year was no different. Two years ago, we saw 4K and HDR flood the market and they continue to make an appearance. Last year, buzz around the ATSC 3.0 broadcast standard was part of the conversation. In 2018, acquisitions and integrations were the talk of the show floor.   

It was another big year for audio as it started to lead in IP and immersive experiences for virtual and augmented realities (VR/AR). Studios and networks are spending boatloads of cash in order to attract audiences to new immersive forms of entertainment. Whether 3D, 360-degree or ambisonic audio, you’ll be hearing a lot more about the technology advancements going forward.

For location sound, the usual suspects in audio manufacturing made their presence felt, but it was not as striking compared to previous years. It’s interesting; we’ve grown accustomed to hearing about new gear around trade show time, and when we don’t, it feels like a letdown. But that’s not the manufacturer’s fault. It is of our own making. Not to mention, companies like DPA, Countryman, Lectrosonics, Sanken, Schoeps, Sound Devices, Wisycom and Zaxcom have already pushed the boundaries of what we believe can be done with audio technology. They’ve improved polar patterns, increased track counts, made things incredibly smaller, integrated workflows, enhanced the durability and advanced countless other modifications.

Many audio manufacturers, to their credit, design gear that’s future proof and doesn’t need to be replaced often. That’s good for the consumer but it puts them in a challenging position to grow. We’ve seen that especially in the last several years. Zaxcom was the first to introduce a wireless system with simultaneous internal recording to a memory card. Now, Lectrosonics is following Zaxcom’s lead, offering wireless that can transmit or record to an internal memory card. Tascam offers similar solutions. There’s little doubt that if Zaxcom didn’t hold a U.S. patent for its simultaneous recording technology it would be reproduced. Outside North America, it has been replicated by Audio Limited with its A10 Digital Wireless System, a new acquisition of Sound Devices. Though it’s worth noting it doesn’t offer simultaneous wireless transmission and internal recording inside the U.S. because of the aforementioned patent.  
 
This is not to say drawing inspiration from existing ideas and adapting them as your own is a bad idea. It’s done all the time. But it needs to be done with caution. In speaking with Intellectual Property Lawyer Michael Cohen of Cohen IP Law Group in Beverly Hills, having “some form of IP protection is not only important but it can make or break a company.” While non-practicing entities or “patent trolls” have created a bad persona about patents, Cohen mentions, “It’s important to realize that for practicing companies it could be their only means of survival.”

And it’s not just the bigger players battling for market position, nor is it limited to those in audio technology. If anything, NAB this year proved that companies are starting to vertically expand their portfolios. Sound Devices made a splash with the aforementioned purchase of Audio Limited, its first venture into wireless microphone systems. The buy allows the company to possibly package the 688, SL-6 and A10 wireless together at an attractive price in the future. It will also be interesting to see if Sound Devices starts integrating receivers directly into its recorders/mixers.

The Wisconsin-based company also announced a partnership with Sennheiser allowing its MixPre-6 and MixPre-10T recorders to capture and monitor 360° spatial audio through Sennheiser’s VR microphone, AMBEO.

Sennheiser showcased its new evolution wireless, the G4 which replaces its popular G3 series. The G4 comes in three lines: the 100, 300 and 500. The 100 G4 series is identical in spec to the 100 G3 line but offers a new housing and a monochrome LCD instead of the orange display. The 500 G4 series is its pro line offering a new chipset for 2,880 frequencies across an 88 MHz band.

Sennheiser also introduced the Memory Mic that captures audio on smartphones. It’s a lapel mic though it’s pretty bulky. It’s essentially a microphone with an internal recorder that can capture up to four hours of audio. Then the recorded audio can be transmitted to a smartphone via hotspot and synced to video. It might be an interesting solution for a plant mic, possibly a scratch track, but the audio quality remains unknown as it was a prototype.

Other quick hits from the show floor included gear from K-Tek’s new “budget-sensitive” Airo line of accessories, Rode’s NT-SF1 ambisonic mic, Rycote’s 3” windscreen dubbed Baseball for shorter mics and Zaxcom is shipping its Deva 24 and Mix-16.

For the Video Engineers of Local 695, Flanders Scientific started rolling out 12G-SDI UHD monitors as large as 65”. Vaxis now offers an extensive range of wireless video systems from five hundred feet all the way up to three thousand feet. SmallHD and Teradek have teamed up to offer monitors integrated with wireless video. The 703 Bolt is a bright 3,000- nit seven-inch monitor offering five hundred feet wireless range while the Focus RX/TX system is an 800-nit five-inch monitor with range of five hundred feet. On the Teradek side, its new Bolt XT and LT provide a zero delay wireless video system. Additionally, Atomos unloaded Ninja V and partnered with Apple to support ProRes RAW for its video recorders.

Company integration is now part of the future of technology. It was the buzz throughout NAB, at least for this observer. We’ll see more companies partnering to simplify workflows. Others will expand to untapped markets like virtual reality or tweak lucrative ideas as their own. Only time will tell which ones will pay off.

The Way We Were

The Way We Were: Adventures in Film Sound

The year is 1938. You’re on Stage 20 at the Twentieth Century Fox lot. It’s 11:45 at night, and you’ve been shooting for 13½ hours.

“Turnover please!” yells the 1st AD.

Optical Recordist c. 1930


 
You signal the machine room operator to roll, waiting for the red light on your mixer panel. Four seconds later, you call out, “speed!” “Mark it,” says the 1st assistant cameraman. The 2nd assistant claps the sticks. “Background” calls the 1st AD, and, from the director; “Action!”

A 2½-minute take ensues. One of the actors goes up his lines for the third time. “Cut!, Cut!, Cut!” yells the director. He walks up to the offending actor and whispers to him, “Wayne, did you really read these lines last night, or were you and Marion out carousing together?” Red-faced, Wayne turns away, and says, “I’ll get it in this take, I promise.”

You pick up the interphone and call Bert, the Machine Room Operator, “How much we have left?” “Three hundred feet,” he replies. You calculate the odds. If they run straight through again, you’ll be fine. On the other hand, if the director decides to pick up again mid-take, you’re screwed. It’s 11:45 at night and the crew is fifteen minutes away from a very expensive night premium. Do you want to go for it, or risk the wrath of the 1st AD for a two-minute reload? He looks at you. The daggers are already in his eyes. “Good to go!” you say, with no small amount of conviction.

And again, “Turnover!” “Speed!” you yell out. “Marker!” calls the second assistant cameraman. You curse him for taking an extra two seconds. What a prima donna… You didn’t even have a chance to ask the script supervisor how long the last take ran. “Background!” and “Action!” The scene ensues. You don’t have a stopwatch. You’re sweating bullets, as the important part of the scene happens in the last thirty seconds, a pivotal moment between the lead actor and actress, which signals a significant change in the storyline. It’s a one-take shot. If you don’t get this, you’re screwed.

“Marion,” calls out the director. “Pick it up at ‘the last time you said that to me, I said no.’” You can’t see her because she’s hidden behind a set flat, but you hear her voice draw up tightly with a hint of exasperation. “OK,” she says softly.

“And … action!” They nail it. Dead on. There’s a moment at the end of the scene which can’t be recreated, which is the moment you know the director was looking for. Despite the fact you couldn’t see them, you know from their voices it was a good performance. The 1st AD looks at you inquiringly. He doesn’t say a word, but you know what he’s thinking. You give him a “thumbs up,” despite the fact you haven’t heard from the machine room operator. You pick up the interphone immediately. A short pause while it rings, and you say to Bert, “Please tell me we got that, or we’re both out of a job.” “Your job is safe,” he replies, “we had thirty feet left.” “That’s a good thing, for both of us” you reply, with a hint of relief. “Better load another one thousand of ’66. I’m not going to chance the last thirteen minutes of the night to this jerk.”

You get on the com to the boom op. “Larry, I think we should swap out for the 10001.” He responds, “OK, but it will take a few minutes. I’ll need to re-balance the weight box.” You calculate the odds. Is it worth it to incur the wrath of the 1st for a somewhat better track, or live with what you have. Camera is reloading. “Do it,” you tell Larry, “and you better be fast,” praying he’s faster than the 1st assistant cameraman.

You look out the back door of your truck. It’s getting cold out. “Pete,” you call out, “if you smoke one more of those cigarettes, you’re going to blow us all up.” He gives you a look, rolling his eyes. “Really?” he says. “I’ve been doing this for eight years now.” “Whatever” you think. “Before that, you were a night-shift transmitter operator. Big friggen deal…” “Oh, and while you’re out there, coil up the rest of the Selsyn cable.”

What the hell are these guys talking about?

The term “load another one thousand of ’66” refers a 1000-foot load of Eastman Kodak 1366, a highly volatile 35mm nitrate negative stock. Hence, the admonishment to Pete regarding smoking. One spark and the truck blows up. “Truck?” you think. Yes, that’s what was used back then. Unless you were on a stage. Weight box? The counterweight used to balance the mic boom, which has to be changed based on the weight of the microphone. “Selsyn cable” was the cable used to interlock the sound recorder and camera together.

Over the past eighty-eight years, the technology and set practices for sound recording have changed significantly. Soundtracks were not recorded on digital files in 1938. They were not using high quality condenser mics. The term “10001” refers to the venerable RCA KU-3A (also known as the MI-10001, a highly sought-after ribbon mic). There were no iso tracks. If you didn’t have it in the mix, then there was no other resort. They didn’t have sophisticated multi-channel mixers. What they had was one channel of optical sound, a four-channel mixer, and hopes that they could figure out the scene in enough time to get it right, or be replaced the next day.

These are some of the themes that we will explore in the column “The Way We Were: Adventures in Film Sound.” Stay tuned…

–Scott D. Smith CAS

Chinhda

Remembering CHINHDA 1954-2018

by David Waelder

Chinhda Khommarath was the most imaginative, creative, technically-savvy, generous, exasperating, shy, opinionated and mercurial individual I’ve known. It was a love of fast motorcycles and rock-and-roll that brought him to our community. 

I met him twenty years ago when I sought someone to make custom alterations to my sound cart. There’s not a crowded field of skilled machinists willing to take on cockamamie projects so I was keenly interested when both Neil Stone and Mike Denecke recommended Chinhda right away. Mike gave the project a boost when he took me in hand and personally introduced me. Chinhda hated meeting with clients but he had an especially close relationship with Mike, who used to bring him along as his boom operator when he was, at that time, still doing commercials. Without Mike vouching for me, Chinhda might not even have met with me.   

Peter Weibel of KEM Editing Systems was Chinhda’s first employer in California. The KEM was a marvelous but sometimes temperamental beast and Peter needed a service technician. He asked a teacher at the Los Angeles Tradetech to send his best student. Chinhda showed up, was hired, set up a machine shop and serviced KEM editing tables throughout the west for many years. Peter said his work consistently exceeded expectations. After Peter moved on to other endeavors, Chinhda continued to service KEMs as an independent technician and set up a company with Joe D’Augustine to rent Avid systems. He also mixed One Night with You for Joe D’Augustine. Over time, Chinhda became a part of the small film community that settled into an industrial corner of North Hollywood not far from the current Local 695 offices. Mike Denecke, Manfred Klemme, Ray Cymoszinski and Neil Stone would get together often for lunch, an Algonquin Club for movie engineers.

After the Emmy ceremonies, Henry Embry brought his statuette to the shop to share the win with Chinhda. Photo by David Waelder
After the Emmy ceremonies, Henry Embry brought his statuette to the shop to share the win with Chinhda. Photo by David Waelder

Chinhda’s work for me also exceeded my expectations. He haunted the aero surplus shops, especially Joe Factor Sales, to find specialty latches and instrument shock mounts to provide protection for the equipment. When I picked up my cart, I mentioned that I thought there was a market for a cart purpose-built to production needs. He nodded and we parted.

Mike Denecke “Father Time,” also a Local 695 Production Sound Mixer, designed and manufactured the first practical timecode slate. He is profiled in the Fall 2009 issue of the 695 Quarterly. [Fall 2009 – Volume 1 – Issue 3 – PDF]
Manfred Klemme At various times, Manfred Klemme was a representative for Cinema Products, Nagra and Sonosax. He assisted Mike Denecke in the development of the timecode slate. Later, with Mike’s encouragement, he established K-Tek as a supplier of boom poles and other professional audio tools.
Ray Cymoszinski Ray Cymoszinski was a Local 695 Sound Mixer working primarily in television. His credits included Everybody Hates Chris, Columbo, Turks and Crime Story. He was also a skilled electrical engineer and designed a portable battery system that Chinhda supplied to local outlets like Location Sound and Coffey Sound.
Neil Stone An independent service technician, Neil developed a timecode conversion for the Nagra 4.2.

More than three years later, Chinhda called and said, “I’m ready.” We developed the design together but, as we worked, it became clear that he had already given the project considerable thought. He had previously built a cart for Mike Denecke and, later, a special cart for Peter Weibel to showcase the Nagra D. My role in the design was secondary. Every piece in that first cart was crafted by hand. Chinhda took great care to make every surface smooth and every corner rounded so that each touch would bring tactile pleasure.

Custom cart built for Ao Loo.  Photo by David Waelder
Custom cart built for Ao Loo. Photo by David Waelder

He had a remarkable ability to see transformative shapes in ordinary objects. An I-beam could be milled to yield a mounting bracket for a recorder; tubing, both round and square, might be cut to produce folding handles and other elements that made the product both attractive and useful. Elegance always had a purpose: folding trays expanded the workstation; gear was securely affixed by custom brackets; crabbing wheels in follow carts permitted straddling the wheel hump in a crowded camera truck. And, his creative energies were not restricted to carts; he also made, from scratch, a portable telecine machine for projects that wanted to shoot film, screen dailies, but also cut on computer.

This perfection presented its own challenges. As features were added to the carts, the cost rose until we were charging $10,000 each but making very little money even though we sold every cart Chinhda could make. His fertile imagination prevented him from locking down designs so we were never able to have components outsourced to CNC fabrication. Everything he made was milled on a Bridgeport with Chinhda moving the work table against the cutting bit by hand. And everything was crafted exquisitely. Creating those parts was his special pleasure.

Many components were like jewelry. Photo by David Waelder
Many components were like jewelry. Photo by David Waelder

His engineering genius was largely self-taught but he did have some instruction in mechanics and electrics. He told me that, while just a teenager in Laos, he took classes in applied arts and worked part time to repair vehicles damaged by wartime service in Vietnam. But it was the draw of motorcycles that brought him to California. Schoolwork assignments did not bring in enough money to buy fast bikes, but smuggling in a war zone was profitable. Inevitably, this led to a reckoning and police arrived with questions. His mother knew immediately what had to be done—she sent the police on their way and locked Chinhda into his room until she could arrange passage to California where he might join his brother. He was on a plane just two days later.

He joined his brother in mechanical engineering classes that, through the instructor’s friendship, brought him to Peter Weibel and motion picture editing. His youthful passions stayed with him throughout his life. He collected guitars and played in a band. While, as an adult, he no longer rode bikes, many of his friends were sure that he would kill himself on that wicked fast Ducati that occupied the front of his shop for more than a year. Wisely, he never took it out.

Chinhda had strong family connections, as one might expect from someone shanghaied into safety by his mother. He never failed to ask about my son. He was close to his brothers and took special pride in his nephews, who formed the core of the technical workforce in early days at K-Tek. He complained bitterly about how Manfred poached them, but you could tell he was proud. He was proudest of the accomplishments of his daughter Kathy, who studied law, gave him a grandchild and now works as an immigration attorney.

He lost his wife K.K. to cancer a few years ago and he yearned to be reunited with her. We wish them both good karma.

Chinhda Clients

The list of lives he touched, either from the sale of products or other work, is extensive. Cart and accessory clients include Coleman Metts, Glenn Berkovitz, Mark Ulano, Mike Guarino, Michael Barosky, Duke Marsh, Geoff Maxwell, Jan McLaughlin, Eric Rueff, Tom Visser, Mark Weber, Steve Tibbo, Noah Timan, Simon Bishop, Mike Sexton, Tom Stasinis, Walt Hoylman, Cloud Wang, Matt Israel, Adam Jones, Ao Loo, Ludvik Bohadlo, Henry Embry, Christoph Schilling, Caleb Mose, Susan Moore-Chong, Peter Kurland, Chris Duesterdiek, Von Varga, Paul Ledford, Edward Tise and Jeff Jones.

(Apologies to anyone omitted.) Besides the USA, countries represented include China, Poland, England, Germany and Canada.

Names in boldface are members of Local 695; italicized names are believed to be IATSE members in their respective regions. Names in plain type are from outside IATSE membership jurisdiction but are often trade unionists in their respective countries.

ProRes RAW

Introducing ProRes RAW

by James Delhauer

In ProRes RAW, Apple seemingly hopes to introduce a new standard that blends the ease of use of the original ProRes family with the post-production flexibility of a RAW file format. In short, this will give ProRes users the capability of accessing information directly from a camera’s sensor during the intermediate and editorial processes.

Though technology in our industry is an ever-evolving force, there are some constants that we have come to rely upon. In 2007, Apple unveiled the ProRes family of video codecs—a series of lossy video compression intermediate formats intended for use with the company’s Final Cut Studio bundle of post-production applications. The core concept was to introduce an easy-to-use, processor-efficient file type that editors could work with quickly while maintaining a high standard of image quality. The result was a “visually lossless” intermediate codec that celluloid film scans and larger digital files alike could be converted to for the purpose of real-time playback editing in a nonlinear environment. With a wide variety of future-thinking features such as 8K video resolution support, 10-bit sampling depth and variable bitrate encoding, the original four ProRes codecs quickly outshined their predecessor—the simply named Apple Intermediate Codec—and rivaled the capabilities of Apple’s main competitor: Avid Technology’s DNxHD. In 2009, the addition of two new ProRes formats increased these capabilities to 12-bit sampling depth at higher bitrates, making the codec that much more versatile.   
 
Though initially intended for sole use with Apple’s suite of proprietary software, ProRes grew far beyond its original intended purpose. Recognizing the value and efficiency of a high-quality but low-size intermediate codec, other companies began licensing ProRes for use in their own platforms. Adobe Systems quickly integrated it into their Premiere Pro, Media Encoder and After Effects applications—direct competitors to Apple’s Final Cut Pro, Compressor and Motion platforms. Avid Technology, despite having its own intermediate format, added ProRes support into Media Composer—the application that has been the industry standard for nonlinear editing since its release in 1989.  
 
In the last decade, almost the whole industry has followed suit. ProRes has become an integral part of daily life for those of us who work in cinema and television. Platforms critical to Local 695 video engineers such as Pronology’s mRes, AJA’s KiPros, EVS’s XT3, In2Core’s Qtake, Atomos recorders, Adobe System’s Media Encoder and Blackmagic Design’s DaVinci Resolve, all offer ProRes encoding and decoding as a standard feature. More and more camera systems that we provide data management services for offer it as a native capture format. In my personal experience on more than two dozen broadcast series, ProRes has been the preferred format on the majority of them. My experience in this regard hardly deviates from the norm.
 
And that is why it was so exciting when a new version of ProRes was announced at the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) trade show in Las Vegas in April. Released as part of a joint venture between Apple and Atomos, ProRes RAW hopes to bridge the gap between convenient, easy-to-edit lossy compression formats and their larger, more robust lossless counterparts. A RAW file format is one that contains unprocessed or minimally processed data directly from a digital image sensor. These formats typically result in video files that are untenably large and, in most cases, are too dense for real-time playback or processing without expensive top-of-the-line workstation computers. This sort of compression has been restricted to edit-unfriendly non-intermediary codecs, such as the proprietary formats developed by Red and Arri or the more widely available but processor- and storage-intensive CinemaDNG format. Apple, it would appear, has taken aim to change that.

In ProRes RAW, Apple seemingly hopes to introduce a new standard that blends the ease of use of the original ProRes family with the post-production flexibility of a RAW file format. In short, this will give ProRes users the capability of accessing information directly from a camera’s sensor during the intermediate and editorial processes. This information includes the sensor’s white balance, color tinting, ISO and dynamic range up to 12RGB bits and sixteen alpha bits. The result is more mainstream access to expensive high dynamic range technology—a process by which multiple exposures can be blended into a single image to maximize both highlight and shadow detail. Moreover, resolution support has been increased to beyond 8K, though the current cap has not been specified by either Apple or Atomos.

Somewhat astoundingly, this has all been done without a significant increase in file size over existing ProRes formats. At release, ProRes RAW comes in two distinct flavors. The first, simply called “ProRes RAW,” is comparable in file size to the original ProRes 422 HQ with a variable bitrate that averages approximately 220mbps at a resolution 1080p with a frame rate of thirty frames per second. The second, entitled “ProRes RAW HQ,” is similar in size to the existing ProRes 4444 XQ at an average bitrate of 500mbps at 1080p30. By patterning these new formats on the two most popular variants of the original ProRes family, it appears that Apple plans to integrate this new technology in a manner that is as un-invasive as possible so as not to disturb users during rollout. As companies adopt ProRes RAW into their platforms, the original line of ProRes products will likely be phased out as obsolete and unnecessary.

In practical terms, this could result in major cost saving and increased time efficiency across the industry. With regards to Local 695 specifically, the various responsibilities of a video engineer or technician include media playback, on-set chroma keying, off-camera recording, copying files from camera media to external storage devices, backup and redundancy creation, transcoding with or without previously created LUTs, quality control, and syncing and recording copies for the purpose of dailies creation. This often requires both high-end workstation computers with large amounts of both processing power and graphics memory, as well as large storage solutions with high-speed media. These tools are expensive, with an introductory iMac Pro (Apple’s current professional level workstation) costing $4,999. A fully upgraded machine can cost a user upward of $13,000. While this may seem excessive, that sort of computational power is often a necessity as feature films standardize 4K productions and push beyond to 6K and 8K workflows—especially for live chroma keying or compositing. Storage costs are not cheap either, with a single use 4tb shuttle drive costing productions around $170 on the low end. But if widely adopted, ProRes RAW could make the inevitable days of higher resolution productions more manageable for engineers at a fraction of the cost. By allowing productions to maintain levels of quality with smaller and less demanding files, ProRes RAW could reduce these costs all around.

It also has the power to simplify and streamline our workflows. A common complaint from producers and engineers alike over the last few years has been the non-standardization of ingest formats in cinema-grade cameras. At present, a video engineer is required to be familiar with just about every file format and codec out there. On feature productions, commercials and high-budget television series, it is not uncommon to juggle REDCODE RAW, ArriRAW and CinemaDNG files in a given day. Each of these require their own unique workflow in order to process clips for editorial so that they will be ready for use and offline to online editing at the end of post production and to create dailies for producers. We are required to be intimately familiar with each workflow and seamlessly move from one to the next during the course of a single day. The widespread adoption of ProRes RAW could be the standardization of RAW video that we have been waiting for, allowing engineers to work via a single workflow in any given day rather than bouncing back-and-forth between two or three separate ones.

Currently, ProRes RAW can only be captured through external recorders manufactured by Atomos. Officially, the Atomos Ninja V external HDMI monitor/recorder was the first system to allow ingest of ProRes RAW files in cameras manufactured by Canon, Sony and Panasonic but a firmware update was released the following day that granted these same capabilities to the Shogun Inferno and Sumo19 recorders as well. These recorders are capable of ingesting the new format at a resolution of DCI 4K (4096 x 2160) at sixty frames per second. DJI then announced that their Zenmuse x7 camera would receive a firmware update allowing it to capture ProRes RAW at a resolution of 6016 x 3200 at 23.976 frames per second. On the post-production end, the new codecs are currently only supported for use in Apple’s Final Cut Pro X platform, version 10.4.1 or higher.

That didn’t stop the whole of NAB from asking about the future of this new codec. Representatives from BlackMagic Design, Adobe Systems, AJA, EVS and Canon Inc. were all flooded with inquiries as to when users could expect ProRes RAW support in their systems. However, Adobe Systems’ Senior Product Manager Patrick Palmer quickly put out a simple statement on the company’s forum: “We’re looking into adding support for ProRes RAW as we speak.” Excitement spread like wildfire throughout the week as everyone from feature filmmakers to video enthusiasts and YouTubers clamored to find out more. There seemed to be an unspoken consensus in the air throughout the Las Vegas Convention Center. The next big thing might have just arrived.

Robert Chartier and Live Synchronous HD Car Process

24frame.com

by Richard Lightstone and Mark Ulano

Before there was green screen, there was blue screen, but well before computer graphics, there was rear projection. The Fox Film Corporation in 1930, on the film Liliom, directed by Frank Borzage, first used it.

The best example would be Alfred Hitchcock’s North by Northwest (MGM 1959). The iconic scene of Cary Grant running for his life as a crop-duster attempts to mow him down.

A scene from North by Northwest. ©MGM Studios
A scene from North by Northwest. ©MGM Studios

The bulk of that scene was shot on location in Bakersfield with Cary running well ahead of the low-flying crop-duster. The most dramatic shot was him diving into a ditch to save himself from the swooping aircraft. That cut was shot on an MGM soundstage, with Cary diving into a set-built ditch and the crop-duster images being rear-projected. Robert Chartier and his company, 24frame.com, have advanced this technique into an even more efficient process. They were invited to enter and demo their process to the Academy Scientific & Technical Awards Committee for the 2018, 90th Oscars.

A rare still of the famous scene
A rare still of the famous scene

Mark Ulano CAS AMPS and I paid him a visit at their massive facility just off of Venice Boulevard in downtown Los Angeles.

We’ve all been involved on insert car work with a process trailer. A time-consuming procedure involving street closures, motorcycle police, safety officers, film permits, stunt drivers and logistics that hopefully, are well coordinated as many lives are at risk.

The camera’s view of projected  driving inside the bus for an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm.
The camera’s view of projected driving inside the bus for an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm.

Robert’s company removes all those potential obstacles by rear-projecting multiple screens surrounding the picture vehicle with made-to-order in sync footage of the street scenes in the safety and comfort of an air-conditioned soundstage.

Robert Chartier first conceived this process in 1994, using Sony 1080i projectors at eighteen hundred lumens with a DLP engine from Texas Instruments. On a project with Director of Photography Gale Tattersall, Robert did video playback of some plates in the windows of the vehicle, but it could only be night shots with the streetlamps going by.

The technique advanced when Christie Digital came out with their 18K projectors. Robert describes his vision: “Basically, the cameras got better, everything’s gotten better, we’ve changed the equipment over and over and over to try to do it right. Then I opted to build our own capture van that had all this equipment in it. Currently, we are using Christie Digital projectors stacked up to fifty thousand lumens.”

Chartier continues, “We are deck operators and we always record everything on decks and that’s for protection but it’s also the fact that we are playback operators and we will play it back on stage, live, all in sync, using four to five projectors at once with five screens.”

They’ll often get a call from a producer or a DP with a script that has car scenes and they are looking for a better alternative then a process trailer or just green screen.

Robert explains, “They can manipulate the lighting, they have all the time in the world to do what they do as DPs. It’s a controlled environment. Safe, visually accurate, with no location permits, police, process trailers, insert cars. This is still cheaper than doing it any other way.”

24frame.com can go out and shoot custom plates for that project or the client can select from Chartier’s vast library with thousands of hours of footage and multiple angles. Choosing the exact footage and location they want for live playback on stage.

The capture van and Aashish Gandhi of Locals 600 & 695
The capture van and Aashish Gandhi of Locals 600 & 695

If the client needs specific plates, they’ll go out in one of their three proprietary capture vehicles and Aashish Gandhi, a dual card holder of Local 695 & Local 600, their staff cameraperson, will man the cameras.

They recently were in Seattle for the new Shonda Rhimes show Station 19 and captured images with seventeen cameras. The entire series is shot in Los Angeles.

Matt Landry (695), Aashish Gandhi (695/600) and Jim McDonald (695) in Seattle for Station 19
Matt Landry (695), Aashish Gandhi (695/600) and Jim McDonald (695) in Seattle for Station 19

“All our footage is in sync, when we show up on the set, we get all the reflections, we get everything going for you,” says Robert. “We become the DP’s best friend with everything we offer. Our Video Engineers do full-color corrections on the fly. We have designed everything to capture an image that will size correctly when we project it. The capture vehicles are built for specific functions that mimic the picture car we are capturing for, whether it is a fire truck, ambulance, bus or passenger car. We come to the stage and all the math and all the physics are correct.”

Recently, Mr. Chartier got a call from an executive post producer at Disney who was about to start a film with a cast of young children with lots of driving sequences.

She was concerned about using a large amount of green screen and then have to figure out later what angle the DP shot through the car to try to get that correct plate.
 
They brought a busload of Disney executives to 24frame.com and Robert showed them the demo and, right then and there they said, “This is how we’re doing it.”

When Steve Carell walked on the set, he said, “My God, now we’re making movies. This is what movies are all about. On Little Miss Sunshine, we were stuck in the desert for three days filming the Volkswagen van and, God, did we, need this.” The capture vehicles record to SSD drives but everything is backed up to multiple rotary drives.  All of the footage is owned by 24frame.com and becomes part of their vast location library.

Robert Chartier: “It’s on a 100TB server and they can view through the web and access the actual files. Some of our plates are twenty-two-minutes long. They can choose the segment and then our coordinator will make sure that they have the plates requested on the set. We always have the shot before and the shot after, so, if the director or DP doesn’t like the bus pass-by in the shot, we shift forward, they can queue up and re-queue and do anything they want, all live on the set. They can ask for a red Corvette, PCH, dusk, dawn, day or night and if we have it, it’s gonna come up all on a searchable database.” A commercial agency from Mexico brought the cast up to LA and shot it on their stage, instead of Mexico City.

Chartier explains, “We provide motion lighting with LED panels in sync with the projected video to reflect onto the vehicle. Because it’s live video, we can pump it into the car, onto the actor’s face, if they go under trees, you see it, if it’s under a bridge, etc.”

Aashish continues, “Because we start every scene from the top of the clip, when the camera turns around for coverage, you still have the same environment. The lighting is consistent from the left or the right, front or back. You have the same truck pass-bys, tree branches and shadows. It’s perfect for any angle you shoot.”

They essentially bring the location to Los Angeles. For the production of Wolves, they drove the capture van to Davenport, Iowa, for two days bringing the footage back and the production shot all the scene here, saving a lot of money and not having to bring an entire cast and crew to Davenport. A train set was built on their stage for The Newsroom, projecting their plates for two days. “It was a lot of work with three cameras, wide and tight angles, handheld, with the actors walking around the train,” explains Hayk Margaryan.

The bus on stage for Curb Your Enthusiasm.
The bus on stage for Curb Your Enthusiasm.

For Curb Your Enthusiasm, they brought a bus onto stage for some driving scenes. Brian Wright describes, “I remember at one point, the effect was so realistic that you could see grips, gaffers, everyone leaning into the turn, but the bus was not moving. It was so interesting to see that.”

Robert continues, “We’ve had complete productions shoot their show here, ten episodes in eight days; it’s all done indoors. They could not have done it in twenty days outside, apart from heat exhaustion and everything that comes with it.”

Hayk Margaryan concludes, “You know, it makes it easier for the crew and the cast to be in a  ontrolled environment, to be in an air-conditioned place, have a place to sit, wait until they relight and then just walk back into the vehicle. You don’t need to drive, it’s safe and a completely controllable situation.”

We want to thank Robert Chartier, Hayk Margaryan, Pacific Winter, Aashish Gandhi, Brian Wright and Jim McDonald for their time and hospitality on a busy day at their facility.

Robert Chartier and his team are pioneers in the video engineering discipline and proud members of Local 695.

Yellowstone

Occupied Land

Production sound joins an ensemble effort to realize Director Taylor Sherdian’s cinematic story Yellowstone.

by Daron James

Thomas Curley CAS casually takes a sip of his iced tea while sitting outside a North Hollywood pizzeria. The sun settles behind a scattering of puffy grayish clouds as a breeze wisps by reminding him of the weather conditions sound endured while recording Yellowstone, a 10-episode scripted series from creator Taylor Sheridan, whose written material includes Sicario, Hell or High Water and Wind River, the latter which he also directed.

Curley’s relaxed, approachable demander disguises any of his previous accolades—a career that started out shadowing Sound Mixer David MacMillan, a now CAS Career Achievement Award recipient and Boom Operator Duke Marsh—which has flourished into an Academy Award, AMPS and BAFTA win for his work on the Damien Chazelle-directed Whiplash. The New York native is as humble as they come residing in Los Angeles and building up the appropriately named location sound recording company Curley Sound with his brother Brian Curley.

“This was the biggest show in terms of scale I’ve ever worked on,” says the production sound mixer, who was hired on through a Whiplash connection via First Assistant Director Nick Harvard. With its massive scope, Yellowstone was an “enormous undertaking” in terms of its production. The hour-long series was the first greenlit project from the newly formed Paramount Network, which meant “quality was the top priority.”
 

Production preps its next three-camera shot as White looks for a place to boom. Photo: Courtesy of Paramount Network
Production preps its next three-camera shot as White looks for a place to boom. Photo: Courtesy of Paramount Network

The allegory follows the Dutton family, led by John Dutton (Kevin Costner), who controls the largest ranch in the U.S. and the people that are trying to take it away from them by any means necessary. Accompanying Costner is Wes Bentley, Kelly Reilly, Luke Grimes and Cole Hauser, who plays his sons and daughters, as well as Gil Birmingham, a local Indian Chief named Thomas Rainwater and Danny Huston as a greedy land developer.

Production shot in parts of Utah and Montana from August to December of last year utilizing the Utah Film Studios in Park City for its studio work. For crew, Curley tapped veteran Boom Operator Knox White and local Utility Andrew Cier. “Production’s hands were tied in terms of spending extra money to bring out a third, but it turned out very well. Andrew came up working with some good people like Sound Mixer Jonathon Stein (The Sandlot). Plus, he knew the local people, the area and the terrain.” Working with White on the other hand was something that was always in the back of Curley’s mind. “I did a day or two with him a while ago, but for most of my career, he was three tiers above me doing James Cameron films. Our stars finally aligned and I brought him out into the woods. He’s a surgeon with the microphone and very endearing,” says Curley. “Better yet, he has stories for days which made the tough days a bit easier.”
 
Curley was flown out for a week before production and engaged with Cinematographer Ben Richardson (Beasts of the Southern Wild, The Chi) to find out “how tough he was going to make it” for them, he jokingly says. “In terms of DPs, Ben really knows technology which is near and dear to myself. He made a really good recommendation that turned out to be the best money I think I have ever spent.” The suggestion was the Ambient ACN Lockit system for timecode. Curley implemented Ambient Nano Lockit boxes to three ARRI Alexa cameras and one Alexa Mini with the Ambient Master Lockit. “Routing our timecode this way proved it was something I never had to worry about and it also made camera happy.”
 

Knox White booms a walk-and-talk between two Dutton brothers. Photo: Courtesy of Thomas Curley
Knox White booms a walk-and-talk between two Dutton brothers. Photo: Courtesy of Thomas Curley


A production meeting ironed out basic concerns, and for sound, they found out for most part they would be out in the middle of nowhere. Even indoors or inside a house, they would be out in the middle of nowhere. The only big metropolitan stops being locations in Salt Lake City and the small town of Darby, Montana.

A lofty boom finds its place on set.
A lofty boom finds its place on set.

Shooting style dictated its own set of challenges as Sheridan directed all the episodes and blocked organically moving through 7-8 pages a day using a three-camera setup. A fourth camera, the Alexa Mini, was stationed on a jib and massaged into the workflow as well. Outdoor sets, which included different areas of the Dutton Ranch, covered hundreds of yards in any direction. Sound had to be ready to cover anything from groups of actors riding on horses often coming from two different directions to following groups of actors traveling uphill, down through valleys and across rivers. Vehicles intermingled with horses, people intermingled with herds of cattle, bison and the occasional grizzly bear.
 
Authenticity was important to the director in order to ground the story and the characters in it. What this meant for crewmembers was turning the whole world around to prepare for the next shot. “Our sets were massive pieces of land so every time we needed to move, we’d often have to push things one hundred yards in another direction over a rocky, hole-filled terrain,” Curley says. Trucks, equipment, crew, video village—everything had to be transported and positioned out of frame. “No one ever felt rushed because everyone was in the same situation. The ADs did a wonderful job handling the logistics to keep the train moving.”
 

The sound team loading the Gator on location. Photo: Courtesy of Thomas Curley
The sound team loading the Gator on location. Photo: Courtesy of Thomas Curley

Sound and other departments used Gator utility vehicles for mobility and Curley constructed two sound carts for different types of shooting. His main cart consisted of a Sound Devices 688 and CL-12 linear fader controller with a Lectrosonics Venue 2 (wideband low) and the original Venue (wideband low) to handle larger scenes. Then a PSC Euro Cart dubbed the “Pony Cart” touted a Sound Devices 633 and a PSC RF Multi SR Six Pack with Lectrosonics SRb Dual Receivers. The smaller cart transitioned easily into bag work. A Comtek base station handled the video village feed and Lectrosonics IFB for boom and utility.

For most of the exterior locations, Costner’s character and the men who worked for him wore thick flannel-styled shirts paired with a large jacket similar to the Carhartt brand and jeans. Sound worked with costumes in pre-production to find a “happy spot” to hide the lav, then gum was placed on the zipper to keep it from slapping around while on horseback. Curley admits he likes to produce “high-quality sound recordings” with a “certain consistency” which meant using the same microphones for the entire run of the project. Sanken COS-11Ds were paired with Lectrosonics SMQV and SMQ transmitters and the occasional Countryman B6 was implemented when a lav needed to be placed outside the wardrobe or when water was in play. Schoeps CMIT-5U, CMC4/MK 41 and Sennheiser MKH 60 and MKH 50 microphones combined for the overhead work. Wireless booms were equipped with a Sound Devices MM1 preamp for easy access to gain control.

The pilot episode opens up with a car accident where John Dutton is left bloody trying to find his bearings as horses scatter. It’s a visual metaphor for the clash between the country life and the impending urban development that overshadows the ranch. Horses a very much part of the narrative and sound was mindful of safety precautions. “It was all about communication,” admits Curley. “Knox was really good about making sure everyone was comfortable on set with any boom movements and tried to buddy up with the animals as much as possible.” Animal Coordinator Paul ‘Sled’ Reynolds, who worked on Dances with Wolves with Costner, ensured everyone’s well-being. Sound would swap out the boom for a lav if issues arouse, and other times, Reynolds would change out a horse if they were acting up to no fault of sound. “We tried to be cognizant of potential problems. If you are, you can try to get out ahead of it,” adds Curley.
 
The vast landscape created swirling windy conditions that were muffled with either a Rycote or Cinela windscreen. At peak wind, lavs needed to be buried under wardrobe with fur. Curley felt the brunt of the conditions during the practical car work when he and a focus puller would hide in the bed of a pickup truck as it zipped through the countryside. The car setup included all the common rigging and lighting, and to record audio, Curley tapped the bag version of his Pony Cart and placed a Sanken CUB-01 boundary mic above the visor and wired the actors. Besides traditional drive-and-talks, cops would pull over vehicles or multiple cop cars would swarm in. In the latter case, additional wires were needed and the boom would join in to pick up sound. “There was a lot of adapting as we went along,” explains Curley. “They eventually changed the driving shots to green screen for more control because many of the roads were extremely bumpy and shook the frame.”

Luckily, it wasn’t all exterior location work as the sound team found itself inside the Helena, Montana, Capitol Building for a scene where Jamie Dutton (Wes Bentley), a lawyer, tries to defend the family position. The sequence had Jamie speaking at a lectern in front of the governor and other officials. To cover its sound, booms were played overhead and the podium microphones in front of them were turned on and recorded to a separate track as an option for post. Additionally, Curley turned off the PA system inside the chamber so it would not interfere with the lavs or boom mics.

Inside Utah Film Studios & Curley’s setup.
Inside Utah Film Studios & Curley’s setup.

One of the larger interior scenes of the pilot took place at a cattle auction. As John enters the building, the camera tracks him around the auction area where hundreds of extras sit and on up to a second floor VIP room. He grabs a seat and watches a little girl sing the National Anthem as others approach him with their own concerns. The scene was filmed at an actual cattle auction location in Utah and Curley brought in a live audio person to set up the PA speaker system and stage mics. More than six hundred feet of XLR cable was run for the setup. Curley hid behind a door underneath the VIP room and was able to mix in the National Anthem, crowd and cattle noises into his mono track, along with the natural reverb of the auction. Upstairs, multiple lavs and a boom recorded the dialog between the characters.

Thomas Curley, Knox White & Andrew Cier. Photo: Courtesy of Camera Utility Angel Fisher
Thomas Curley, Knox White & Andrew Cier. Photo: Courtesy of Camera Utility Angel Fisher

Mixing, Curley prefers to run a limiter “just in case,” as with digital, “the only thing that can’t seem to be fixed is overmodulation.” “Running the limiter makes me aware of my gain structure. If I find myself hitting the limiter more often than I should, I turn the gain down. It keeps me honest,” says Curley. He also tends to not play with parametric EQ basing, his philosophy on the idea that it’s better applied in a controlled environment where it can be easily removed if it doesn’t work. A low-frequency roll-off around 80 Hz or as much as 120 Hz is added to the mix if something noisy is nearby like in many of the scenes that feature a helicopter.
 
John Dutton uses a helicopter as a mode of transportation around the ranch. Dialog driven scenes took place either directly outside before boarding or through headsets during flight. To record usable audio, the team employed two methods: one with the helicopter turned off completely and the other with the engine turned off but the rotor still churning.
 
Wide and tights are the norm for most productions, but the sound team faced super-wide shots to show the striking landscape coupled with extremely close shots that followed the action. “We were getting the audio, not the way we’d like to, but something I learned over the years is that you address your concerns and ultimately you have to let them decide.” To curb larger audio issues, the wide camera would be turned off once they achieved what they wanted visually.
 
Curley pushed the gear to its limits, often running 10 ISO tracks with some scenes featuring eight different speaking parts. Double booming was the norm and actors were wired the majority of the time with the exception of some stunt and action sequences. The mixer arrange his wires in dialog order so he could visually see the progression of the scene on his faders. “It’s easier not to get confused this way instead of going back-and-forth across the board. If I haven’t brought up a fader, I know the dialog will still be coming.”

Inside Utah Film Studios & Curley’s setup.
Inside Utah Film Studios & Curley’s setup.

In a climactic scene of the pilot, sixteen men were on horseback, others rode four-wheelers, police cars lined the road, gun shots were fired and a helicopter flew overhead witnessing the chaos. The scene was shot over three nights and broken up between action and dialog. While it was one of the biggest track days in terms of wired actors for sound, the way it was scheduled allowed them to keep pace. “Logistically, there was a lot of moving parts, but it was just a matter of jumping in and keeping our high standards,” says Curley.

Realism was a theme throughout the production. Whether it was importing trees from Montana to build the log cabins inside the studios or the fight scenes where stunt men didn’t hold back or the extensive aerial coverage that enhanced the scale and scope of the story. Eight episodes were shot before weather curbed production. The final two will be finished this year. “Quality is important to Taylor as a filmmaker,” says Curley. “If you watch his other projects, he is very intent on making a real and believable world for his characters to be in. That decision to be authentic doesn’t make our jobs easier, but that’s not why we are there to do it. We’re here to support him and I really lucked out having Knox and Andrew with me. When you start seeing episodes on screen, you get a feeling that all the hard work you’ve done is worth it.”  

Bear boom operating.
Bear boom operating.

The Greatest Showman

by Daron James

Sound channels dialog and music to capture P.T. Barnum tale.

Musicals can be a difficult task for production sound mixers. There’s spoken dialog, dialog that transitions into live song or playback and vice versa. There’s straight playback recordings, thumpers, earwigs, speakers, Pro Tools rigs, music editors on set and other contingencies you need to answer. The Greatest Showman from Australian Director Michael Gracey is as ambitious as they come and Production Sound Mixer Tod Maitland was up for challenge.

Maitland has traveled the sound block since the ’70s, earning his Los Angeles union card working on the TV series MASH as a Boom Operator. He eventually found steady work on the mixing board and since has worked with some of the biggest titans in the industry. In 1990, he snagged his first Oscar nomination for Oliver Stone’s Born on the Fourth of July and followed that up with two more noms for JFK (1991) and Seabiscuit, from Director Gary Ross.

Hugh Jackman as P.T. Barnum All photos by Niko Tavernise/20th Century Fox

One of the films Maitland worked on that featured plenty of music—The Doors (1991)—initiated many of the techniques he uses today. The Greatest Showman is a rags-to-riches tale about America’s original pop culture promoter P.T. Barnum (Hugh Jackman) and how he turned his family’s life around in the most peculiar way.

Before shooting began, there were eight weeks of rehearsals in Brooklyn which the actors used to become familiar with their lines and songs. As actors gained traction, it provided an opportunity for sound to record those songs in their own voice at the rehearsal space to use for playback. “We began by already having prerecorded music and temp vocals sung by professional singers. This is what we played back when rehearsals began for dance and music,” explains Maitland. “We built a small recording booth there and once the actors started to get the movements and feeling comfortable singing to the prerecorded temp vocals, we began to record temp vocals with the actors. Together with the music editor, we recorded using the booth in the rehearsal space. This is advantageous for two reasons. First, it allows the actor to bring in their inflection and have an idea of how it works with dance. The other, being that you want them to be comfortable with their own voice.” During rehearsals, sound also implemented earwigs and thumper so actors were comfortable using them when production began.

Once an actor had the performance down, they went to the recording studio to record the final track. There the studio would use three different microphones to record. One being the studio mic, the other two being Maitland’s boom and wireless mic. “Recording the tracks this way allows for a smooth transition in editing the dialog on set to the prerecorded singing. By using the same microphones I use on set, the transition from studio mic to set mic sounds more real,” Maitland notes.

The crew filming the “magical lantern” scene inside the Brooklyn rooftop set

Re-recording Mixer Paul Massey couldn’t agree more. “The songs fall into a few categories. They’re either an all-out performance inside the circus or an auditorium or one that is more reflective. When we transitioned from dialog to song, it had to be seamless. The challenge is in the vocals and to make sure the environment around it doesn’t disappear coming in and out of song. Matching pitch, timbre, quality, voice and reverb all needed to be addressed. Having the studio recordings use the same production microphones helps this tremendously so you can dirty up the studio vocals to match the grit and voice of the production dialog.”

Rounding Maitland’s sound team were Boom Operator Mike Scott, Sound Recordist Jerry Yuen and Playback Mixer Jason Stasium. Production shot in New York, using historic locations like the Woolworth mansion, the Prospect Park boathouse, the Brooklyn Academy of Music and the Tweed Courthouse, among others. To bring to life Barnum’s museum of wonders, an extensive set was built at Capsys, an old brick factory owned by Steiner Studios.

The script is laced with dialog and more than ten original songs from Academy Award winners Benj Pasek and Justin Paul (La La Land) of which sound needed to track. When actors were required to lip sync, they were wired with a microphone so production could listen to the sync. “We set up a dual monitoring system for the sound supervisors and music editors so they can hear the playback in one ear and the live actor singing in the other. This way, they can hear if the actor is on or off sync. We also have them use binoculars to watch live, not off video monitors, which has a two-frame delay. It’s all about keeping it as real as possible,” states Maitland.

The song “A Million Dreams” between Barnum and his wife Charity (Michelle Williams) illustrates the technique. Cinematographer Seamus McGarvey captured the rooftop performance with Alexa 65 cameras skimming over 1800s New York with the Hudson River in the background. Since the rooftop was so big, sound placed speakers so the actors were never fifteen feet away from one. “You never want to set up a speaker fifty feet away and blast the actors because you will have time delay. Every frame is important to lip syncing,” Maitland continues. “Hugh and Michelle are dancing everywhere on the roof, so we placed speakers all over so it was equal for them.”

Phillip (Zac Efron) and Anne (Zendaya) sing “Rewrite the Stars Day” at Steiner Brooklyn Studios

Live singing required everyone who needed to hear the music to wear earwigs and the team would mic everyone vocally involved. Scenes that started off in dialog and then transitioned into playback also required earwigs for the actors so they could start singing on cue.

One of those ambitious sequences takes place between Barnum and Phillip Carlyle (Zac Efron). The two sit at a bar having a drink and Barnum is trying to convince Phillip, a sophisticated man of the theatre, to quit and join him in the circus as his protégé. What ensues is a choreographed bar song dubbed “The Other Side” that includes dance, drinking shots and flipping glasses. It’s flashy and fun.

After camera filmed the scene, they will do an additional take for sound which allows them to record all of the body movements as a separate wild track. “The actors use earwigs or Comteks with headphones so they can hear the music and then continue to make all the same movements while shooting the scene to playback. This allows post to add the track under the recorded audio to make the sound more believable,” says Maitland. In fact, this technique was used for all the musical numbers involving playback, including “The Greatest Show,” “Come Alive” and the Golden Globe Award-winning “This Is Me.” Similarly, songs filmed inside the circus tent would have the crowd reenact their actions while actors performed with earwigs to create the wild track that didn’t contain any dialog or music.

Sound looked to create a seamless operation for the director finding ways to make things easier on set. They found themselves switching from Sanken COS-11D and Countryman B6s lavs depending on the wardrobe and went out of their way to record any props that were period, like the cash machines or typewriters, to create a catalog for post.

Maitland regularly maxed out his two Cooper 208 mixers, admitting he prefers the Cooper over any digital board because of the ability to EQ. “I like the immediacy of EQ. Some people don’t want you to EQ, but when you get an actor’s voice in your head, you want to deliver that same voice through the entire movie. If the actor is wired and they turn their head all the way to their left, they’re going to be off mic, losing the high end. I can adjust that with one hand of my fader and the other on the high-end EQ. You just can’t do that on a digital board.”

Looking back on what was Maitland’s second feature of the year, he admits he couldn’t have done it without the good people around him. “We had a really great crew. When you’re surrounded by people you can trust, it makes it so much easier to get done what you need to accomplish.”

The Post

Sound delivers dialog-driven true story for Director Steven Spielberg

by Daron James

The crew shoots inside the office of Editor Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks) as characters discuss news stories. All photos by Niko Tavernise/ 20th Century Fox

For Production Sound Mixer Drew Kunin, The Post isn’t his first film with the iconic, award-winning director, Steven Spielberg—that memorable moment goes to the Cold War-thriller Bridge of Spies, starring Tom Hanks and Mark Rylance (Dunkirk), which Kunin, along with Andy Nelson and Gary Rydstrom, shared a Sound Mixing Oscar nomination in 2016. A New York native and 695 member, Kunin is a first-generation mixer and started from the ground up, booming student and indie films before catching a break on Jim Jarmusch’s Stranger Than Paradise (1984).

The Post reunites Hanks with Spielberg, and for the first time in her career, Meryl Streep joins his cast in a film that may not have been released in 2017. In March of the same year, actor Oscar Isaac (Star Wars: The Force Awakens) dropped out of Spielberg’s The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara, for “personal reasons” which shifted the director’s focus to The Post.

This true story is about bringing long-buried truths to life and the protection of free press under the First Amendment. Streep stars as Kay Graham, the first female publisher of The Washington Post and co-star Hanks as its driven editor, Ben Bradlee. Scooped by The New York Times, they race to catch up and expose a massive cover-up of government secrets that span three decades and four U.S. Presidents.

Graham and Bradlee must set aside their differences and risk their careers and freedom to publish the now famous Pentagon Papers.

Harmlessly titled the “History of U.S. Decision-making in Vietnam, 1945-66,” the documents were originally prepared for U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara in 1967, and in this film, played by actor Bruce Greenwood (Star Trek Into Darkness). It was Daniel Ellsberg (Matthew Rhys), a military analyst at RAND Corporation-turned-whistleblower who began secretly photocopying all seven thousand pages of the papers sheet by sheet with his girlfriend Lynda Resnick at her advertising agency.

Sound double booms a scene between Ben (Tom Hanks) and Kay (Meryl Streep) 

The Pentagon Papers revealed that Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson repeatedly misled the public about U.S. operations in Vietnam—even as the government said it was pursuing peace, behind the scenes it was covertly expanding the war. The truth may not have been exposed if it wasn’t for Ellsberg and The New York Times, and then The Washington Post stepping in to publish these documents.

The production spanned only eleven weeks in New York, and even though it would be Kunin’s fourth project of the year (Wonderstruck, You Were Never Really Here & The Upside), the schedule worked for the mixer, Boom Operator Michael Scott and Utility Jeanne Gilliland. “I don’t know how much has been emphasized about how truncated the production and post were in the press, but it was very rapid. The shoot was the shortest for Steven since the ’70s and he certainly hasn’t had this quick of a post production,” says Kunin.

Production Sound Mixer Drew Kunin fills out a production report for The Post

Pre-production was more relevant than ever as the director turned to longtime Cinematographer Janusz Kaminski to pace the visual details set in 1971 America. Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2s and 35mm film focused the look that played out in newsrooms, offices and dinner parties. “There was so much dialog in this script,” Kunin continues. “Bridge of Spies was extremely talkie with scenes up to five people but The Post had up to fifteen actors in scenes, scripted with really great dialog that was super snappy. Scenes were crammed with words.” To record the overwhelming amount of dialog, Kunin deployed multiple Sonosax mixers and an Aaton Cantar X-3 recorder.

Spielberg also understood the importance of capturing good production sound and was a voice for it during the entire process. “He’s always had an ear for sound, but he became more of an advocate because he really wanted the production sound not to be problematic,” notes Kunin.

An early obstacle was the newsroom of The Post. Production Designer Rick Carter scouted an empty office building in White Plains, NY, that was about to be turned into luxury condos. The production moved in and used its floors to slate the world filled with desks, mid-century typewriters, Rolodexes, period telephones and carbon copies of stories everywhere. The problem being, there were still tenants in the building so they couldn’t fully control the air conditioning.

As many sound mixers know, any noisy machine can bleed into an audio track. Based on Kunin’s recommendation, production brought in a consultant who was able to divert the air conditioning from the shooting side of the floor to the staging area where video village stood.

One sound theme in the narrative was plot points spoken through telephone calls. “The calls were all done live. The actors on both ends of the phone were being recorded through period phones so post wouldn’t necessarily have to add a filter,” explains Kunin. “The very first time Meryl was in the film, she wasn’t on set but calling in. I hooked up a more complex system than I wanted, but it allowed both Steven and Tom, who she was speaking with, to hear her through the phone.” During the rehearsal, Kunin mixed Streep quite higher than he normally would. “Steven loved the sound so we kept it that way for the scene. When we did the next phone scene with reporter Ben Bagdikian [Bob Odenkirk], Steven requested that I make it sound like Meryl’s call. We then proceeded to do all phone calls for the film this way.”

According to Kunin, the setup involved a Viking DLE200B “ring down” box. The unit could power two telephones with four conductor modular plugs and standard phone cables, which allowed the actors to talk to each other on a closed line without needing to be connected to a network. The on-camera performer would speak into a working period phone connected by a phone line to one input of the Viking box. Sound then put a telephone splitter on the downstream side of the Viking box where one side of that split would be routed to the off-screen performer on a period phone or cell. The other side of the split would be run to an additional period phone that was used to record the dialog of the off-screen performer.

Kunin removed the mouthpiece of that additional period phone and then taped a DPA 4061 lav against the earpiece speaker with foam over it wrapped in Duvetyne fabric and sealed with gaffer tape to isolate it from ambient sounds. “By removing the mouthpiece and cutting out the wires, we made it like a deadline, and there wouldn’t be any feedback from the room. But you could still hear it and record through the earpiece.” The DPA was normally hardwired with an Ambient XLR adaptor and 48v power to the mixer’s Sonosax. At times, it was connected and powered with a Lectrosonics SMQ transmitter. Sound resorted to variations of this rig numerous times, even creating one for a live seven-way call where Kay Graham decides whether or not to print the papers as Ben Bradlee and members of the Board plead their case on why she should or should not.

Scenes were covered with more cameras than normal because of the truncated schedule forcing sound to keep a lav on everyone and double boom the pirouetting cameras. For Streep, generally a Sanken COS-11D was paired with Lectrosonics transmitters while Hanks had on a DPA, but a mix of both, along with Countryman mics were used in the production.

A sequence that had plenty of movement was when The Pentagon Papers first arrive in the hands of Bradlee and his team. They end up mining through them at his Georgetown home that was built on the soundstages at Brooklyn’s Steiner Studios. “Steven has a great sense of what he wants to do and we get to see all the moves Janusz has worked out in rehearsal,” says Kunin. “We always try to get a boom overhead, but with a scene this radical, we had to look to the lavs, especially going from room to room to room. Sometimes there was no way for Michael to walk through a doorway with the boom, so Jeanne would step in with a second boom or we would plant mics. We even planted mics in the rooms to help build the tension to the scene.”

On set with Steven Spielberg, Streep and Hanks inside the White Plains, NY, office set

Graham was often the only woman in this man’s world, a theme sound capitalized on by shaping her point of view in the mix which Supervising Editors Richard Hymns and Brian Chumney and Re-recording Mixers Andy Nelson and Gary Rydstrom continued in post. “Steven wanted the sound to be period accurate. Especially in the newsroom,” says Rydstrom. “But the other thing was this idea of a wom­an in a man’s world. We looked at things as simple as the way her high heels sounded to add to the subliminal under­tones of the movie.”

After The New York Times published its front-page story, “Vietnam Archive: Pentagon Study Traces 3 Decades of Growing U.S. Involvement,” on Sunday, June 13, 1971, it only took the Nixon administration two days to ask a federal court for an injunction to halt any further publication. The Washington Post took a huge gamble publishing the pa­pers, but in the end, it paid off as other newspapers followed suit. For Kunin and his team to relive this history, he says it was tremendously challenging because of the amount of dialog but genuinely they all had a lot of fun.

Hostiles

Production sound travels the desolate countryside for Director Scott Cooper’s genre film.

The film opens on the wide plains of the West, a family tending to its prairie farm. Safe, happy. Until it’s disrupt­ed by a group of wild Comanche on a war path of massacre and thievery. The father, mother and two daughters have little chance. One after another, they fall to the ground, breath leaving their body. Clutching her wounded baby girl, Rosalie Quaid (Rosamund Pike) hides herself until the calamity calms—a reminder of life in Southwest 1890s America.

Rosalie (Rosamund Pike) clutches her newborn as Capt. Blocker (Christian Bale) tries to help

Director Scott Cooper (Black Mass) wanted to honor the legacy of the Western genre in Hostiles, but blend modern themes of reconciliation, healing and equality into the nar­rative. Set in 1892, Army Capt. Joseph Blocker (Christian Bale) is exhausted from decades of battle and sees retirement around the bend. Reluctant, because of their dark history, he’s tasked with escorting Chief Yellow Hawk (Wes Studi), a dying Cheyenne and his fam­ily from New Mexico to the tribal grasslands of Montana. As the discordant group journeys from the isolated Army outpost of Fort Berringer, they encounter the widow Quaid, and later, the hostile Comanche. In order to survive the 1,000-mile trip, they’re forced to confront their preconceived notions of one another and band together in a story of compassion and tolerance that tests the resilience of the human spirit and our wiliness to change.

José Antonio García finds a moment to rest on the location-heavy shoot

José Antonio García finds a moment to rest on the location-heavy shootProduction Sound Mixer José Antonio García, alongside Boom Operator Jonathan Fuh and Sound Utilities Daniel Duerre and Daniel Carlton, captured the audio to the location-based shoot. Both Local 695 members, García and Fuh have been a team for decades now. “We met twenty-eight years ago on a low-budget, nonunion proj­ect,” recalls Fuh. “His boom operator at the time didn’t show up and the UPM gave José my num­ber to call. The rest is history.”

The two mesh well because they share similar high expec­tations in the work they produce and seemingly enjoy the same movies. As Fuh puts it, García comes from Mexican new wave cinema, knowing directors like Alejandro Iñárritu (The Revenant) and cinematographers like Emmanuel Lubezki (Gravity) with Fuh’s background stemming from Taiwanese new wave filmmaking. And it shows how well they work together, having been nominated for an Oscar on Ben Affleck’s Argo and CAS Award noms for Babel, Iron Man 3 and Clint Eastwood’s biopic of American pilot Chesley Sullenberger, Sully.

Hostiles was their third project of 2017, sandwiched between the short Carne y Arena and the Dan Gilroy feature Roman J. Israel, Esq. “The locations of this film were challeng­ing. I couldn’t tell you how many times we had to shut down because of thunder or lightning in the area,” says García. Production roamed the horizons of New Mexico and Colorado to create the visual grammar as Cinematographer Masanobu Takayanagi (Silver Linings Playbook) shot ana­morphic, pairing Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2s (G-series, T-series lenses) and Kodak stock.

Jonathan Fuh capturing sounds of a moving train

Wardrobe attracted sound’s attention early on as Costume Designer Jenny Eagan (Beasts of No Nation) used wool for the Army suits worn by Capt. Blocker and his men. Characters, more or less, dressed in the same attire which allowed sound to collaborate with costume to sew in special pouches for wireless transmitters. “Acoustically, wool is very loud and you can hear the mic rustle against the fabric, so we needed to find the right placement for our mics,” notes García. By using Countryman B6s, they were able to hide the tiny lavalier behind buttons, and for Bale’s character, the mic was placed inside the scarf instead of the body. “The B6s don’t have as great of a sound as the Sankens or DPAs, but they did very well protecting us against the wind,” adds Fuh.

Sound positions its mobile Gator rig on location
Fuh with his wireless boom outside the Quaid household

Since nearly eighty percent of the movie was exterior loca­tions, wind was a constant battle with sound changing out its wind protection for the boom during heavier gusts. As with many productions today, two cameras shot wide and tight frames so the sound team reacted by wiring actors and finding the best place for the boom. “We always try to get as close to the action as possible,” Fuh says. “The radio mic will always win, but we always have a wild track on the boom because it may not be that bad when it comes time for post.” Instead of a monitor on his boom, Fuh relies on knowing what kind of lens is on the camera to bring him closer to the scene. Sound also recorded wild tracks of wind for post that includes Supervising Sound Editor/Re-recording Mixer Skip Lievsay, Sound Designer/Re-recording Mixer Paul Urmson and Sound Designer Craig Berkey.

José Antonio García takes in the beautiful surroundings of production

Characters traveled through the valleys and mountains by horseback, and while production minimized dialog sequences of them riding, plenty still existed. The camera was mounted on either an electric golf cart with an arm and stabilizing head, or when action was intensified, a suspension buggy was brought in. Sound needed to be bag-ready, covering up to six different actors at a time. There’s some instances where they traveled with their own mule to get through the mountains or would set up a remote wireless system in order to get closer to the action with minimal equipment.

Ryan Bingham, Pike, Bale, Wes Studi, Tanaya Beatty, Adam Beach and Q’orianka Kilcher in Hostiles

Sound needed to be cautious working with the horses as to not make them nervous. “We were limited to what we could boom,” admits Fuh. “We had to be really gentle about it as you don’t want to trick or put them in a panic with actors riding them. You almost have to be like a ninja so you’re not seen or heard.”  Cooper went to great lengths to create accurate depictions of Native people. A team was on set to help actors with gestures, rituals and language. A significant amount of the dialog was spoken in the Northern Cheyenne dialect to firm the cultural and historical integrity of the film. The multilingual García had to pick up the language quickly to decipher when actors would stop and start talking. “I have a natural way with lan­guage and it really boiled down to needing to learn the first and last few words or sounds to mix accordingly.”

García staying out of the sun complete with apple box and mixing bag. Crew photos courtesy of José Antonio García/Jonathan Fuh. Hostiles photos by Lorey Sebastian/Yellow Hawk, Inc.

When the story reaches Fort Winslow, a resting stop for the travelers, Blocker is asked to take a prisoner to a nearby city to face sentencing. The confined is Sgt. Charles Wills (Ben Foster), who knows Blocker’s grim history well. Expected to face certain death, Wills tries to persuade Blocker to release him and questions why he’s escorting Yellow Hawk instead of killing the family as they ride toward Montana.

One rainy night, Wills is tied to a tree pleading his case. Water-resistant mics were able to cut through the weather and capture the dialog. Unfortunately, that wasn’t the case for another scene when Master Sgt. Thomas Metz (Rory Cochrane) spoke to Blocker about leaving the convoy. “What we didn’t expect was how soft-spoken this movie would be,” says García. “We were able to get through it all except this particular scene with Rory. They had so much rain coming down on set and there was a canopy overhead creating this drum sound. It was too much.” The production mixer made Cooper aware of the situation, but because of the visual demand of the scene, it would require looping in post—something every sound mixer tries to avoid but happens in nearly every film.

A scene that took sound in a new direction was a song accompanied by guitar around a nighttime campfire. It was meant to be playback with lip sync, but since the actor had a decent voice, they recorded it live. The lav was placed on the outside of his shirt behind the button and caught the instrument and voice perfectly.

For this shoot, and the many others García and Fuh have done together, they approach each scene like water. Whatever the shape of the production, they flow into the open spaces they are given. García admits this project had an astounding group of people. “It really starts with Scott. We enjoyed working with him. His energy is contagious and he’s enthusiastic. He has a way of conveying his message that makes our job and everyone else’s life easier.”

“Why Unions Still Matter” and Politics That Make a Difference

by Laurence B. Abrams

Education and activism were at the center of Local 695’s 1st Quarter 2018 General Membership Meeting held January 20 at the Local 80 Sound Stage in Burbank. Jennifer Halpern, Education Outreach Coordinator for the IATSE in New York, was on hand to introduce two special guests … Diane Thomas-Halladay, Director of the Labor Education Program at the University of Arkansas in Little Rock, and Erika Dinkle-Smith, who works in Washington, DC, as the IATSE’s Assistant Political and Legislative Director.

Diane Thomas-Halladay, Director of the Labor Education Program at the University of Arkansas in Little Rock

Diane delivered a comprehensive and compelling two-hour presentation on the topic of “Why Unions Still Matter.” She began with an engaging history of Labor in America, including the origin of the IATSE, formed in 1893 when representatives of stagehands from eleven cities met in New York to discuss working conditions for their peers and who ultimately, formed the IATSE to support each other in the effort to create an industry that would allow for fair wages and better working conditions. Next came the years of widespread worker exploitation that led to the passage of FDR’s seminal National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (NLRA), where an enlightened and productive balance was established by acknowledging the needs of both the workers and the companies who hired them. Diane spoke about the three decades that immediately followed enactment of the NLRA, marked by extraordinary economic growth and productivity that came in tandem with strong wage growth and upward mobility for working Americans.

But political changes that followed in the 1970s, led to the cynical “trickle down” promises of the Reagan era, when Americans were asked to believe the absurd notion that shifting the wealth of the middle class to those already wealthy would somehow benefit working women and men. Charts and numbers drove the point home, showing in no uncertain terms how continued attacks on unions, stagnation of wages, laissez-faire deregulation for businesses and ever-lowered tax rates for the rich do nothing but harm workers and the middle class.

But Diane didn’t leave without planting a positive outlook to the future. While many unions across the country are seen in decline, the IATSE is clearly not one of them, posting steady membership gains each and every year for decades, very much in keeping with President Loeb’s theme and goal for the IA … Growth = Strength. Make no mistake … unions across the country are getting louder, stronger and even more determined.

Erika Dinkle-Smith, the IATSE’s Assistant Political and Legislative Director in Washington, DC

Diane then introduced our next guest, Erika Dinkle-Smith, the IATSE’s Assistant Political and Legislative Director in Washington, DC. Erika made it clear that there are significant dangers that Labor will be facing in the coming months, from Janus v. AFSCME, an upcoming case before the right-leaning Supreme Court asking the question, “Do members of public unions have to pay dues?” to the “Employee Rights Act,” a cynically named right-to-work act on steroids, designed to lower wages by further weakening unions across the country. And with an increasingly divided Congress, the challenge to actually get something done, let alone do something to restore prosperity and stability to the middle class, becomes very difficult to achieve. But Erika also described a path to making real and positive change. If the game is to be played in Sacramento and in Washington, then we must play it there, too. And the time to act is now. As Erika so vividly phrased it, if you don’t do the hard work that it takes to get a seat at the table now, then surely you will find yourself on the menu tomorrow. And since we don’t intend to do that, the IA is making its presence known in the California State House and in the US Senate and House of Representatives. Politicians are learning how big our industry is and how many voting citizens our industry impacts. Erika also explained that this kind of activism is resource-intensive. It requires lots of volunteers and commitment, and lots of money and time. If the reaction of the 695 members who contributed on Saturday to the IATSE PAC Fund and who put their names on the Volunteer Sign-Up Sheet is any indication, it looks like we are prepared to take that challenge and we will indeed stand up and make our voices heard. The membership of Local 695 is engaged in solidarity and ready to fight for fair wages and for a strong union. 2018 elections, here we come!

Stress Management

Report from the Young Workers Committee

by Eva Rismanforoush

Occupational stress has long been acknowledged as a serious health hazard in the industrialized workforce. It is as an underlying factor of hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, substance abuse, and it does not distinguish between ethnicity, gender or class. Workplace stress is also directly linked to chronic psychological disorders such as anxiety, panic attacks and major depression. We are often exposed to extreme weather conditions, environmental and health hazards that can range anywhere from rattlesnakes, structually compromised buildings, airborne pathogens and hazardous chemicals, etc.

As members of the entertainment industry, we face some of the most adverse jobsite conditions and hours in the developed world. We spend seventy-plus hours a week on set during a regular TV season or a feature film. We are often exposed to extreme weather conditions, long hours, environmental and health hazards that can range anywhere from rattlesnakes, structurally compromised buildings, airborne pathogens and hazardous chemicals, etc. But we work because it is a central part of our lives and we creatively thrive through it. However, as exhilarating and interesting the job may be, the sheer magnitude of daily logistical efforts and close personal interactions can cause stress.

Our bodies are equipped with a natural coping mechanism, which is activated when a potentially dangerous situation is detected. It is called the “fight or flight” response. It always proceeds in the same manner: the danger stimulus, the removal of the danger and a state of relaxation.

While this mechanism has been crucial to our survival as a species, it is designed to only activate in isolated instances. “Fight or flight” served our ancestors well as they fought off natural predators. Yet as the developed world becomes increasingly safe for humans, the American Psychological Association reports that stress levels in the twenty-first century are higher than ever.

Today, many of our stressors come in a much subtler form and stem from a broad variety of factors. Whether it is increased productivity demands, muscle strains from booming increasingly long digital takes, dealing with trying personalities or never being appreciated for the quality of work we produce. All of these causes can trigger a “fight or flight” response. But we got so used to working in demanding environments that we may be unaware of the body’s reaction. And whether we are aware of it or not, the constant “on-alert” state is cumulative and takes a toll on our physical and emotional well-being. Bruce McEwen, a neuroscientist at the Rockefeller University, recently revealed that exposure to three weeks of stress can change mammalian brain-architecture. Forcing his rats to swim, among other adverse activities, shrank the dendrites in their amygdalae, the parts of the brain that control emotional responses, decision-making and memory. Some of these effects are reversible, but such changes increase the risk of anxiety disorders and depression. McEwen also linked chronic stress to a reduction in the overall neuron number.

WHAT IS STRESS?

Stress is a household term used to describe a hormonal surge in our bodies resulting from physical and mental strain in adverse circumstances. Hans Selye, Director of University of Montreal’s Institute of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, first coined the term stress in his letter to the British journal Nature in 1936. Selye’s “general adaptation syndrome” (GAS) study, which was later renamed “stress response,” revealed morphological changes in mammals due to prolonged and excessive secretion of naturally occurring stress hormones.

COPING WITH STRESS

Our bodies are vastly resilient while malleable to the environment. Neuroplasticity, the ability of neurons to reorganize to compensate for injury and disease, allow us to recover to some extent. Kelly McGonigal, Psychologist at Stanford University, suggests that altering how we process stress determines its detriment or benefit. Living without it is improbable, but learning how to use it to your advantage can lead to an overall healthier & happier existence.

This means ending a stress cycle in rest and recovery, whether by not checking emails & social media on the weekends, taking more holidays or going for a walk in the middle of the day. In the right mindset, stress can even be performance enhancing.

Even Hans Selye distinguished stress reposes into “eustress” and “distress” later on in his career.

But how do you get there? We thought it best to harness the knowledge from some of our most esteemed colleagues, who have been in this line of work for decades. They have all found engaging ways to process stress and lead healthy and productive lives. Here are their thoughts, please enjoy!

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“The job itself comes with built-in stress because of the fluid nature of it. Home life is hard to keep balanced. Early on, I had to make the choice to accept these conditions completely or not. Once I chose, I committed. Having committed relieves much of the stress and making sure that your loved ones know that you are not the boss of your time can help relieve potential stress. On the job, I always prepared for scenario A, B, C or the unknown. I operated from a position of being ready for anything at any time and not letting it ruffle my feathers if things changed, because, they always do. Pull a rabbit out of a hat, change a pigeon into a bouquet of flowers. The stress of the job goes away when you accept:

1. You have no control and nothing is predictable

2. You have done your homework even though the call sheet and script can be torn up and thrown out at any time

3. Piss-poor planning makes for piss-poor performance = stress

4. You have all the tools and tricks handy to handle every situation

5. You are able to pull out these tricks at a moment’s notice

6. Never be lazy, always be busy and alert. The minute you slack is when the s**tstorm  hits

7. You have the confidence to jump in and do what needs to be done, especially under fire

8. You have accepted the fact that you will be working until they tell you that you can go home

9. Be happy that you have chosen this work every day. No one is holding a gun to your head to stay, so might as well spread a positive attitude so your work environment can be fun and rewarding

10. Realize that there are many people who would be more than happy to take your place

“With all of these things in mind, kick your shoes off and unwind with a glass of vino at the end of a long hard day and try to catch some zzz’s”

– Peggy Names, Boom Operator

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

 “I’ve always felt that the film business is what you make it. It is intense; there is big money at stake every day. Pressure builds, tempers flare and it becomes cumulative among departments as it spreads down from the top. The trick is, as I see it, is to recognize the tsunami coming your way and prepare accordingly. Certainly, preparation is key. But I’ve always told my assistants that as the production company gets crazier, you get calmer, to the point where you are almost comatose. My dad taught me to ‘work hard and go home.’ I’ve lived that for forty years in the business. It’s worked for me.”

– Randy Johnson, Boom Operator   

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“I’ve had many different relationships with stress in my forty years in 695. I’ve dealt with it most every way possible, from alcohol or reefer, to exercise and meditation. I feel the key to dealing with it is to know yourself and to know what stress is. For me, it’s been an evolving relationship through the decades. When I started out, it was like young love and I was high on stress, thinking it was like romantic love, all-consuming and that it would always be like this. It was exciting but exhausting and not sustainable. As the years piled up, I learned to give my all between call and wrap and then shut that door as I got into my van to drive home. This became my time. I dreamed up projects, personal or family, listened to music, anything was cool as long as it wasn’t work-related. For me, it is paramount to have your own life that you maintain and respect as much as your career life. I love family (which can have its own stresses), hiking, playing drums or ukes, painting, photography, fine food with friends, travel and sleep. After all these years, it is easy to keep stress in check when I have a balance of work and play. That and the joy I get from the world-class education I receive observing and marching in the ‘Grand Parade’ of life. It is hard to stress what was or might be if you are actively living in the here and now.”

– Crew Chamberlain, Sound Mixer

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“To get a handle on stress at work, I begin with arriving to set early. Being consistently punctual to your location is paramount and sets the tone for the day.

“Do your homework: Knowing where you’re at in the script and its shooting schedule is a good way to keep the stress monsters at bay. If you know there will be a scene at a waterfall or a big dance number, you will be able to prepare for it and be prepared when it happens. Smaller details like day/night number gives you an indication of costume and wiring changes.

“Taking care: Exercise is another key to fighting stress and yoga has done that for me. It keeps me centered and my attitude in check.

“Nutrition: I will be the first to say, I love pizza for a second meal, complementary food trucks and my morning espresso, but food does have an effect on your mood and your stress level. Moderation is the key and knowing when to curtail the caffeine definitely helps.

“Humor, Thought = Empowerment and Positive Thinking: I’m very fortunate to get to listen to actors act, the telling of jokes and experiencing sublime and scary words and descriptions. For me, humor and just sitting there thinking, leads to a positive outlook about my situation. That leads to empowering my mind and confidence level. How do I get there? I need to be honest with myself and what’s bugging me and deep always clears my head. I can then focus on sound for the scene or try to help others. Wanting to do the best job I can and rooting for the success of others is a direct result of empowering your mind.”

– George A. Flores, Sound Mixer

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“The secret to my sanity is taking my day one moment to the next and not over-thinking it.”

– Lawrence Commans, Boom Operator

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“In late July, I was balancing three major shows for my three biggest clients. I put in 240 hours in 19 days. This included travel, working double shifts, on top of the usual rigors of my job. To add to that, I experienced personal distress, any of which would be a large task to take on with a normal job situation. I remember walking onto the truck, and sitting at my record station, when my gut said, ‘If you don’t take time off soon, you will die. You can’t keep going at this speed.’ I booked a vacation for four days immediately. I went away to a wellness spa in the desert. I turned off my phone for a week, and didn’t tell anyone where I went (except for my mom). Four days was not enough, but it was enough to bring me down from the adrenaline high that I had been riding on for so long, in order to come back and sleep solidly. After that, I decided to take another 2½ weeks off.

“During this time, I realized I needed to create somewhat of a routine. The lack of structure this business lifestyle affords me is not conducive to a healthy lifestyle. Here are some of the things I started to do:

  • I started with my diet—I cut down on drinking, carbs, sugars, dairy. I bring all my own food to set with me, even when I travel. The snacks I bring are organic, easy on digestion, yet filling and satisfying.
  • I recognize I may not always get eight hours of sleep, but the few hours of sleep I do get, should be quality sleep.
  • I routinely see a chiropractor and massage therapist while I’m in town.
  • I don’t drink while traveling because it is dehydrating.
  • I travel with a foam roller to stretch and work out.
  • I always upgrade my seat when flying for more leg room. This is my time to rest when I’m traveling.
  • I try to drink a gallon of water every day.
  • I try to exercise, which usually means stretching in the morning and evening.
  • I always leave the truck for fifteen minutes and walk— seeing sunlight is essential.
  • I learned how to quiet my mind.

“Lately, there’s been a focus on small enjoyments of life. When we are constantly go-go-go, you need to take a minute to enjoy life. Find a small joy that takes you out of your day.

“I have had jobs that have caused health issues due to stress, and I’m lucky that I have been able to recover from them. Last year, I went through a breast cancer scare, which made me take a look at my life and examine what I find most important.”

– Jillian Arnold, Digital Asset Manager

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“Stress management and proper set etiquette is really what separates the A-listers from the rest of us. We work in an industry where the creative process often demands to make things happen against seemingly impossible odds. I have been screamed at in my face for issues that were not related to me, I have scrambled around troubleshooting in front of one hundred-plus people all waiting on video to fix the problem and asked to do the impossible over and over. I rarely get yelled at anymore (thankfully), but I tell all the guys on my team that when you do, it’s not personal. There is legitimate pressure rolling down from above. I worked on The Revenant and Chivo, the DP, was incredibly demanding at moments. I just worked with Chivo two days ago on a commercial and it was a totally different experience.

“There are a few tricks that can help avoid unnecessary trouble. I make a practice of introducing myself to the agency on a commercial so if there are any issues with image, they know they can come to me personally to fix it rather than complaining to the producer. It’s simple but it works. Also, communication with the 1st AD is paramount. Newcomers must realize they are responsible for communicating their needs. If you need ten minutes to solve a complex request, you must explain that to an AD. They are your lifeline to make sure the people who matter know what’s happening and to give you the appropriate time.

“No one enjoys the looks you get when the company is waiting for video. I learned that the hard way years ago working with a fantastic director, Rupert Sanders. I was on my first job with him, was brought on by the producer to impress him. She had seen me perform well in many difficult situations so I had credibility with her. Things had been going well until we set up for a difficult choreographed shot with horses, mud and explosions that required a big reset. Just as we were about to call action, the image from the wireless went out and monitors went dark. I intensely wondered what could be wrong as the scene went on. We cut and the director turned and just said, ‘Bye bye, Willow.’ It was in the days of film, so there was no way to play it back and he asked me why I didn’t stop the shot. I was mostly confused & embarrassed that I didn’t make the call and realized right then, it was my job to do so.

“A big part of handling stress is how you recover after a mistake. Often we get blamed for issues that may be camera- or power-related or may indeed be on us as video assist technicians. Sometimes criticism is valid. I despise that moment but handle it by telling myself I am good at my job and trust that by the end of the show, they will see how that moment was not indicative of my normal routine. Professionalism is key and it’s important to remind yourself that everyone is dealing with stress in their respective departments. But what we can do is focus on the job, keep your eye on the ball and maintain confidence. Even if you just threw an interception, you must believe that next throw is going to be a touchdown.”

– Willow Jenkins, Video Engineer

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“1. Exercise—It will lower the toll on your body & has psychological benefits.

2. Hydration—So important & often overlooked. A lack of hydration will cause fatigue and more symptoms that could lead to health problems. By the time you feel thirsty, you’re already dehydrated.

3. Keep learning & pace yourself.

4. Recognize your own signs of burning out: One thoughtless action could ruin weeks of relationship building.

5. Try not to be competitive, but rather, collaborative. The film industry is always expanding.

 6. Make personal plans—Even if they have to change a lot; life moves quickly and you don’t want to realize it’s too late for certain things.

7. Be someone others at work look forward to seeing.

8. DON’T overbook yourself. You need “Me” time.

9. Get enough sleep. 10. Choose how you see your job/department on the set; don’t let others make that judgment call.”

– Patrushkha Mierzwa, Boom Operator
  Patrick Martens, Boom Operator
  & Mark Ulano, Sound Mixer

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“Part of my routine in keeping myself sane and healthy is trying my best to not bring work home with me. Every day is filled with challenges and often annoyances and I think it’s important to check those at the stage door. Home life becomes just that—home life and nothing intrudes on it or its routines. I find the people I’ll be working with and for to be an extremely important factor on choosing jobs. It makes all the difference when the people you work for are good to you. You pay it right back at them. When you are genuinely happy and have a good attitude, it is way less likely that those who work around you who may have a bad attitude to be able to affect you.

“I feel like if we worked fewer hours per day (max twelve on twelve off—but ideally, ten hours call to wrap), we would all be much happier. If I could have dinner at home or out any night of the week I wanted yet still work a full day, I would be even happier. And mind you, it’s not necessarily about the dinner … It’s about the time. If we feel like we have to drive home and rush to bed in order to get adequate sleep before the next shooting day, we end up feeling cheated out of our free time.”

– Devendra Cleary, Sound Mixer

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“Having a family has really made me value every minute I have. We definitely max out our weekends, and while it doesn’t make for a ton of rest, at least I have great memories and a feeling of accomplishment come Monday. Earlier this year, I took four months off and managed my daughter’s fast-pitch softball team and participated in their school events for the first time ever. My husband and I agree, taking care of the kids is much harder than our day jobs (he’s a grip) … So after a stint with the kids, we are actually ready to go back to work. We also always take time off for those precious moments you can’t get back, like trick or treating. It’s important to work with people who also value family or personal time, because it really helps minimize burnout. Taking a day off once in a while isn’t going to stop the show, and it can benefit a fellow 695 member who really needs hours. Win-win!

“One thing I now take more seriously is my health. I no longer put work before annual physicals or illness. Our yearly physical is one of the best benefits of our health insurance, so use them! And if I’m sick, I stay home. Last thing I want to do is make my fellow crewmembers ill. No one is going to think you’re a hero when you’re coughing all over set.

“I love hour walk always. I get outside, walk or ride my bike and rack up some vitamin D. I’ll take care of small errands like washing the car or hitting the Rite Aid. Five lunch hours correlate to a big chunk of my weekend, so if I don’t have to spend it buying shampoo, I’m thrilled. Drinking enough water is always a challenge for all of us, but staying hydrated does wonders for your energy level. Joe Foglia and I remind each other to hit the bottle all day long.

“I absolutely take into account the people I’ll be working with, the type of project, the commute and the season length. Hour-long episodic can be a grind, so unless you’re working with people you enjoy, it won’t work. We spend more time with our work families than our real families. If we can’t have a good laugh once in a while, it’ll be a very long season.”

– Anna Wilborn, Sound Utility

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“I’m fortunate to have relatively little stress in work and life. However, I’m certainly not stress-free. When the stress arrives, the best thing for me, if possible, is to remove myself physically from the situation that is causing it. That can be relatively easy in everyday life but can sometimes be hard to do on set. Usually, I can find a nice quiet corner somewhere to unwind. The timing is the tricky part. Outside of the workplace, playing the drums or guitar has always been a wonderful activity to help me get away from it all and clear my head. However, my absolute favorite all-around tension-relieving, mentalcleansing activity is going for a strenuous run at the beach. It never fails to return me to a tranquil state of mind.”

– Mark Agostino, Music Playback & Live Recording Mixer

=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =  =

“It is no secret what a difficult business we have chosen. It can be challenging enough just to find suitable and sustainable employment; then, when you get the gig, be careful what you wish for! Long and irregular hours, travel, weather conditions, challenging locations, nasty commute, job security and every kind of work-related stress can take its toll on your health, relationships, mental and spiritual health. Despite the heroic efforts of our dearly departed Haskel Wexler, just getting home from work can be quite hazardous. As a long-term survivor in production sound—thirty-six years since I bought my first Nagra (that’s a little scary when I see it in writing!)—I am very happy to be asked to contribute some ideas about stress management.

“Love what you do, but not to the exclusion of all else; given the crazy number of hours we work, it is hard but important to seek balance in your life. The job can be incredibly frustrating, learn to not go home bitter. That makes showing up the next day a lot easier. On the other hand, sometimes the best thing you can see is that job in your rear-view mirror. Know when to hold ’em and when to fold ’em. There are more jobs than one and sometimes the one you have is not really the one for you.

“Our work is in many ways, so very hard. Even if you’re not hauling cable or setting c-stands or building sets or swinging a boom with a wind-screened shotgun at full extension, the work is physically demanding. Even if you’re not directing the movie or doing a budget or a schedule or mixing a scene with nine mics and playback, our work is mentally demanding.

“Here’s what I do to keep myself prepared to meet the challenges of our workplace that are maybe a bit different than others: I ride my bicycle. I mean, I really ride my bike(s). On weekends I do long rides, often with a group, including gran fondos or century-type rides. Most days at work, when lunch is called, I get to my sound trailer, do a quick Superman change into my cycling togs, jump on my “at-work” bike, and pedal away from the set as fast as I can for 30-50 minutes, 8 to 15 miles. It’s not much, but when I’ve been stuck at my cart all morning on a dark stage, or I’ve had some frustrating moments, or whatever, it allows me to get my heart pumping, muscles working, my eyes can focus on infinity, my senses sharpen and I can play in the traffic where the phrase “thrown under the bus” is not a metaphor! It is amazing how this breaks up the day and revitalizes me for the second half. It’s amazing how many little lunch routes I know around LA. Almost wherever I find myself shooting, I’m rarely too far from somewhere I’ve already been and have ridden—the city is smaller and more connected than you think. Downtown? MacArthur Park to Griffith Park by way of Chinatown and Elysian Park is a great ride! Universal/Disney/Warners? Griffith Park is right there. Hollywood? Get to the hills. Santa Clarita? So many ways if it’s not too hot. The Culver Studios? The Ballona Creek Bike Path is just around the corner, also some good climbing at the Overlook Park on Jefferson. With smartphones and laptops, it is so much easier to figure out than when all I had was the Thomas Guide!

“I also know there are cyclists among us who appreciate beneficial effects of exercise-induced endorphins and the stressreducing power of doing something you love. I encourage you to make it a part of your work life!

How about a Local 695 cycling club, road and dirt?

Who’s in? “I would like to emphasize that when the pressures of work and life get to the point where no amount of bike riding can help, we are fortunate to have an excellent health plan that includes a strong mental health component. I urge you to take advantage.”

–Steve Nelson CAS, Sound Mixer, husband, father & cyclist
—Follow me on Strava

The Young Workers Committee thanks everyone who participated in this article and hopes this piece serves as a reminder to take good care of your team and yourself as we enter the homestretch of 2017 and many years to come.

Sound Apps ViSi

Soundcraft ViSi Remote

by Richard Lightstone CAS AMPS

Expression

THE SOUNDCRAFT ViSi REMOTE IS AN iPAD APP, which provides wireless control of Soundcraft Si Expression, Si Compact, Si Performer and Vi Series consoles. ViSi Remote allows you to mix and contour your sound from anywhere in a venue without being constrained by cables. A single iPad can control one console’s levels and graphic EQ. Multiple iPads can control a single console’s settings. This means that you can control the performers’ monitor mix directly from the performance position on stage. A single iPad could control a number of consoles in a network, which may include any of the consoles noted in the above range, so Si and Vi consoles may be mixed on a network.

With version 3.4 comes the addition of channel and bus processing control and metering within the app for Vi console types Vi 1, 2, 4 & 6. Control input gain, pan, routing, delay, filters, EQ and dynamics and see channel and bus level meters and dynamics gain reduction metering within the processing control section, and use the Meters tab to see all console meters at a glance and jump quickly to any block of eight channels or busses.

All Vi console types now include metering and full channel & bus processing control.

Here are some of the features of the app. You can optimize the front of house mix from anywhere in the room. Set mic gains and 48V. Adjust monitor levels (IEM) while standing next to the performer. Adjust channel strip settings remotely from the console. Extend the fader count of an existing control surface. Use in standalone mode for familiarization with console functions. Control a network of consoles (e.g., FOH and Monitor). Have a global metering overview or “meter bridge” as an extension of the console.
You can also control the following from ViSi Remote, Channel naming, Input faders and mutes, Bus, master LR and VCA master faders and mutes, Mic Gain and 48V, HPF, Channel EQ with

grab able parametric EQ curve, Gate and Compression settings, Pan, Output Delay, LR and Mono routing, Phase Invert, Graphic EQs on all bus outs, Graphic EQs on all bus outs, Channel contributions to each FX bus, Mix contributions to each matrix bus, DMX Masters (Si Performer Only).

I have used ViSi Remote for my Expression 1 console on a period musical where we had stage wedges for each performer’s monitors. I was able to stand with that performer and remotely adjust their wedge monitor levels and EQ. The app is very impressive as you have the functionality to control so many parameters of the Soundcraft console.  

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 16
  • Go to Next Page »

IATSE LOCAL 695
5439 Cahuenga Boulevard
North Hollywood, CA 91601

phone  (818) 985-9204
email  info@local695.com

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

IATSE Local 695

Copyright © 2025 · IATSE Local 695 · All Rights Reserved · Notices · Log out